Jacki D draws attention to what's likely to be the slithering filth's next talking point: You can't trust a Law Lord to judge these things. Ian Murray points out the basic insanity in this argument.
I'd add a hearty 'WHS' while pointing out a further insanity here. One of the distinguishing features of the L3 agenda has been support for judicial activism. So now they argue that judges can't be trusted to do their own job, but they can be trusted to do Parliament's job by legislating from the bench.
How much weed do you have to smoke before that makes sense ?