Hey, Liberals, Who's In An Echo Chamber Now?

For those of you keeping score at home, crazy extremist Nigel Farage got through to the final of 'I'm A Celebrity' while the guy foisted on the Tory Party by the supposed wizards of electability is on course for a record defeat. 

The smart set claims Rishi Sunak isn't worried about the contrast between the two of them, but it's noticeable he himself made sure to have a photo-op carrying out his own version of a bushtucker trial, being pictured with a really huge snake. 

No, wait, my mistake that was actually Michael Gove. Meanwhile, back in the real world, Farage was already meant to be dead and buried thanks to voice of the people Nella Rose - or as the public generally refer to her 'who'? 

Not only does Nella, 26, who is of Congolese descent, tick diversity boxes, but crucially her social media content — her hair and make-up video blogs are particularly popular — meant she already has millions of fans who follow her every move.

She's the voice of a generation, you guys!

Well, OK, then. Let's assume this angry and divisive race-hustling bum's rise to Tik Tok fame is totally kosher, even though, well, you know, look what happened next:

It is no secret within ITV that Nella was viewed as a future face of the channel. She even signed up with agent Jonathan Shalit – known as a star-maker courtesy of managing Charlotte Church and Myleene Klass — in a bid to raise her profile.

Shalit also has strong relationships with ITV, having worked with Good Morning Britain hosts Susanna Reid and Kate Garraway in the past.

One insider at the broadcaster revealed: 'Nella was on the list for a while....

The idea was that that show, with its millions of viewers, would make her a household name and she would be handed lots of work by ITV

Yep, she's not Rosa Parks, she's the Girls Aloud of politics, sticking it to The Man with the help of her handlers at Sticking It To The Man Ltd, a division of Smash The System PLC. 

Hey, we're all supposed to hate the 1970s comedians but at least those guys served a gruelling apprenticeship on the club circuit. Meanwhile, the MSM tries to push these grifting clowns down the public's throat, only for them to meltdown as soon as they have to deal with, actual, real people. 

There's a lesson in there for the Tories but I'm sure they'll pretend not to notice. 

They just need some targeted ads on Instagram, that'll change everything.

This Is Why Soldiers Invented Fragging...

Ladies and gentlemen, I regret to inform you that Colonel Blimp is at it again. 

Did you get that? We're a 'particular cohort' and a 'particular part of the spectrum' (nudge, nudge, wink, wink) who don't deserve to be involved in serious conversations. 

As ever, I note that if actual conservatives talked about anyone the way the cucks talk about conservatives, the cucks would be demanding they be jailed for hate speech. But that's not even it. 'Deputy Party Chairman' is neither here not there, it's just not that big a job. Meanwhile, in so far as the Prime Minister and Chancellor are both impeccably well-connected, smug globalists who have nearly as much contempt for the public as Blimp himself, aren't they both the very model of the Ellwoodian ideal? 

Hey, how's that working out for that Party anyway? 

When is it time for a 'serious conversation' about why all the guys who talk constantly about muh electability don't appear able to win actual elections? 

I Don't Think A New Leader Will Fix This...

Start as you mean to go on you cucks!

The Tory Party's first leadership debate is tonight and so naturally they've decided to hold it on GB News...

No, just kidding, it's Channel 4. 

Of course it it. Why wouldn't you hold it on such a famously unbiased channel? 

Yep, this one. 

Just to ram the point home, the moderator is Krishnan Guru-Murphy, the sneery rich kid race hustler. 

And, seriously, if a born filthy rich, private school & Oxford educated Metro media lovey can't speak for the conservative base, who can? 

There's a serious point here. Why is the Tory Party giving credibility to a liberal cess pit like Channel 4 anyway? 

Nothing these people are involved in qualifies as 'journalism' by any reasonable definition. Expect ninety minutes of stupid gotchas, 'have you stopped beating your wife' and the loony obsessions of Metropolitan wokies. 

The point is the modern Tory Party is useless as an ally and harmless as an enemy. They won't do anything to help their base but they'll pander to a bunch of smug North London prats who will never vote for them in a million years. 

A Cuck Gets Capped

Like I keep saying, you can get into bed with the left but they won't respect you in the morning. Latest example of this rule: former future Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. 

Hey, it seems like only yesterday he climbed aboard the SS Strange New Respect by endorsing the left's screechy eye-scratchy attack on BoJo for mentioning the Jimmy Saville thing. Apparently it was outrageously outrageous to suggest that the head of the Crown Prosecution Service has any influence over prosecutions. 

And that's how Rishi Sunak got the enduring gratitude and affection of the left!

Remember: this is the guy that the Professional Conservative Brains Trust was assuring us was a political genius. These cucks are still out there now, trying to stop anyone pointing out the absurdity of the left's position.  What is the left's point after all? That billionaire globalists have utter contempt for the countries they pretend to be loyal to? 

Yes, I do believe some of us have already noticed that. Meanwhile, the left (and the cucks) have spent years calling anyone who mentioned it a Nazi. They might not like billionaires but if it was a choice between supporting them or being on the same side as actual patriots? 

Exactly. 

Cuckservatives: 'We Identify As Electable'

Like I said over at J's place, looks like another success for Operation Wokegeld.

Yep, another identitarian-conservative who turns out to be certainly the former but not so much the latter. 

Honestly, it's enough to make you nostalgic for the old days when you bribed a guy and he stayed bribed. 

Meanwhile, how about tolerating the fact some people don't want their five year old daughter exposed to someone's 'lady penis'? Any 'openness' to that world view? 

But isn't this just the perfect example of the bogusness of the cuckservatives position? We were told that the Tory Party needed to embrace these people to stay electorally viable. Now - in a stunning development no one could possibly have predicted - it turns out they're unhinged lunatics, it must be time to ditch them, right? 

Right, cucks? 

Electability: This Is What It Actually Means

Like I keep saying, the biggest myth in British politics is that conservatism is a tough sell. 

We keep getting told that the Tories have to throw any actual conservatism overboard to get elected. Actually, the truth is pretty much the opposite: the only reason sleazy cucks like Neil O'Brien ever get elected is that voters have the vain hope that they might actually support something conservative. 

For proof of all the above, consider the Labour Party's position on the Police And Crime Bill. Or, rather, consider their multiple positions on this bill. For a supposedly extreme piece of legislation, they sure do seem to be struggling to say what it is they don't like about it. 

Apparently, the bill is super awful! Terrible! The worst.... but they dare not say exactly how and why.

That's the deeper point. The cucks keep giving us these patronising lectures about how, y'know, you guys, they'd totally like to support some actual conservative policies but they worried about muh electability. 

Well, here's an actual conservative policy and the left dare not oppose it openly. Sounds like a vote winner to me! So, how about it cucks? 

The conservative base has spent years being told it had to suck up cringe conservatism as the price of winning elections, now it turns out that actual conservationism is a vote winner, these guys will totally be getting on board with it, right? 

...

No, I don't recommend holding your breath either!

A Cuck Cucksplodes On The Launch Pad

True to it's mission statement aiming to 'push back against the herd mentality with new and bold thinking' UnHerd comes out with a post attacking... Donald Trump. 

Yeah, baby, they went there. Daring!

I know what you're thinking:

Hey, DJ, does the post by any chance include painfully pretentious pseudo-intellectualism and shoehorned in references to ancient history while never actually laying out any actual, specific charges against Donald Trump? 

You know it does!

Actually, it is groundbreaking in one respect: most TDS posts at least get through the first 100 words before going off the rails. Here are the opening words of this one:

It was one of the weirdest moments of the last four years: President Trump stood before a church, holding a Bible like he'd never seen one before.

Presumably, the point of the stunt last summer was to reassure godly Republicans that he was on their side, during the depths of the BLM protests and riots.

Just a random church? Or St John's Church in Washington DC, the one every US President had worshiped in, right up until Antifa savages tried to torch it the night before? 

That was why he was there - he was visiting the scene of the attempted arson of a historic building by fanatics. But never mind that, the key thing is he looked kind of weird - that's some top drawer intellectual analysis right there!

Meanwhile, what were the respectable conservatives doing? 

Hiding, mostly. That's what counts as morally upstanding in Cucklandia: being neutral on the whole 'desecrating churches' thing. The Republican establishment spent the whole summer AWOL while America's cities burned but now they're ready to take on the real enemy: their own voters. 

And it's not even as if the cucks can claim to be any good at winning elections. Weren't Mitt Romney and John McCain the poster boys for respectable conservatism? How did they do again? 

At least DJT won in the first place. These guys got wiped out at the ballot box but apparently, in the US just as in Britain, no matter how many times the cucks stand on the rake, the conservative movement will never need to move on from cuckservatism.  

Cuckservatives Find A Dung Heap To Die On

Hey, I'm so old I remember when the cuck wing of the conservative movement couldn't go five minutes without talking about the vital vitalness of 'electability'. Once Fat Dave started his reign of error in 2005 there was no stopping these people from lecturing everyone on how important it was to ditch any actual conservative policies in pursuit of electoral success. Actual conservatives had to get with the program, you guys, and realise this wasn't the hill to die on (where 'this' meant any actual conservative policies whatsoever). 

Well, it turns out a funny thing happened just recently: I believe the technical term for this is an 'open goal'...so where are the squishes? If winning votes is your thing, deporting homicidal lunatics would seem to be just the ticket.

Hey, free clue wets: there's a reason why it's the crazy wing of the Labour Party which has taken up this cause while Sir Keir is busy hiding under the stairs. Labour could always introduce a manifesto commitment to protect the rights of Persons of Homicide but, strangely enough, they're happy to outsource it to Mr Justice Crazypants and the rest of the unelected freaks on the bench. 

Nope, the non-insane parts of the Labour Party know they're juggling nitroglycerine. Deporting felons is not just the right thing to do (duh) and also a vote winner (duh), it's also the perfect example of why people gave the Tories an eighty seat majority in the first place. Nobody voted for violent lunatics to be given an Access All Areas pass to Britain, it was just one more thing the snoot class managed to sneak into law via phony baloney, non-adversarial lawsuits between activist lawyers and pro-open borders government departments.  Now, at last, the left is being forced out of the closet and made to stand up and state openly what they've always believed ('Open Borders Uber Alles'). 

I don't think it'll go well for them... except the cucks seem desperate to let them off the hook. As Meatloaf would say, they would do anything for electability, but they won't do that. Everything else is up for grabs, but deporting killers? That's just so dreadfully suburban!

Nontroversy!

Like I keep saying, the big difference in politics is that the left wants the right silenced, while the right positively encourages the left to speak at great length about they believe.

Take today's alleged controversy:  apparently, it's super outrageous that the Government is deporting foreign criminals. 

Huh?

What definition of 'controversial' are we using here? Is there anyone outside of the fever swamps of the left who doesn't think this is exactly what HMG should be doing?

Being able to control who gets to live there is pretty much a basic requirement for being able to call yourself an independent country.

More to the point though, if liberals think even convicted rapists shouldn't be deported, in what sense do they not support open borders? Who exactly would they deport - aside from conservatives ?

Equally, if deporting scumbags strikes the left - and the cuckservatives - as an outrageously extreme policy, how come they keep pretending to support border security every time there's an election on? Wouldn't they be happy to proclaim their love of open borders from the roof tops right up until polling day?

But no: the left is so confident in open borders as a winning issue politically that they keep demanding any potential critics are silenced and shouted down. They're the voice of the people, providing no actual people are allowed to speak.

Hey, maybe that's the answer: we tell them we're not deporting criminals, we're just operating a nationwide 'no platform' policy.....

Cucks 4 A Caste System

If you want a barometer of how worthless Licensed Conservatives are, just look at how they all jumped to defend muh free speech when it was Jo Brand, but went MIA - or even piled on - when it was Count Dankula.

Or Sargon.

Or... well, anyone actually - just as long as they're outside Snoot Club.

The theory seems to be that by penning 10,000 word essays praising their own nobility in not condemning Fatso McAcidface, the left will be shamed into seeing the inherent hypocrisy of their position and take up the cause of free speech.

Ah huh.

Basically, it's a demand for unilateral disarmament in the culture wars.

As HD says, how's that working out for the right?

Liberals don't worry about being exposed as hypocrites. They get off on making us follow rules they have no intention of abiding by. It's the whole point of the exercise. When the cucks defend Jo Brand they're implicitly accepting this premise. They're accepting that there's a de facto caste system in Britain. There's the common rabble, constantly harried by a zillion hate speech laws, and then there's the Brahmin caste who can not only say whatever they want, but expect us to admire their courage in so doing.

Jo Brand, huh? So daring. So courageous. How does she get away with it!

Hey, I'm thinking the cucks continuously babbling about muh sacred principles probably help.

It's The Moronberg Rally

To borrow a riff from the great Stefan Molyneux, the 'Trump ballon' was the perfect metaphor for the left's anti-Trump rally: way smaller than the MSM tried to make it out to be, it was a load of hot air that served simply to show that the Metropolitan left has all the cash, but no actual ideas.

The left wanted a show of force, but it turned into a show of farce. They claim to be for 'The People' but they can never get any actual, normal people to attend their little tantrums. Instead, there were the usual suspects:

 Public sector union thugs

Totes moderate, you guys, Islamists

Spoiled, upper-middle class brat antifa kids

And most of all....

Smug, Metropolitan remoaners

If you didn't, like, totally hate Drumpf anyway, the sight of these people protesting against him would have left you thinking better of the Golden Don. This wasn't virtue signalling, this was snobbery signalling, a sneerathon for the priggish and the privileged.

You don't need to be Sigmund Freud to see that reason they hate Trump so much is that they're projecting on him their generalised hatred of the uppity lower orders what don't Know Their Place.

In fact, the only people who really seemed to be impressed by this freak show were the Tories. On a weekend when normal people were reminded how weird and repulsive the modern left is, the Cuckservatives all but joined them in the street.

That's what we mean when we say the Tories aren't conservative. It's not about specific policies, it's their basic worldview. They might pay lip service to the idea of trusting people, getting the state out of peoples' lives and the like, but when it all comes down to it, they share the same basic worldview as the self-satisfied ponces marching through the street.

Hence, why they misread the mood of the country like this. They're not part of the country, they're part of a tiny sliver of the country, situated in about six postcodes in north London, and they think normal people are just ignorant chumps to be bamboozled every five years when an election rolls round, but otherwise ignored.

And That's Why It's Called 'The Cucktator'...

The Spectator with a scorchingly hot take on why Britain's governing party can't get traction in our nation's capital:

London shows what happens to the Tories when [redacted] become a minority

Can you guess what the missing word is? 

Obviously, it's 'homeowners'. That's literally the one thing everyone mentions about modern London: very few homeowners there. Hence all those acid attacks and stabbings: renting makes people cranky.

And, yes, he really does it mean it:

Red London is a preview for the Tories of what happens when enough homes aren’t built.

Yep, that's why there's pressure on housing in London. Not enough supply, that's literally the only reason.

Well, anyway, it's the only reason you're allowed to mention and still get invites to classy dinner parties.

About That 'Electability' Thing....

I don't know where that unfortunate elderly couple from Hither Green are staying but I assume it must be a big place, since the whole of the Tory Party seem to be hiding out there too.

To put it another way, if President Assad really does have chemical weapons, he just needs to store them on an encampment of Loveable Traveling Folk and Theresa May won't go near them.

All of which raises the question: are the Tories motivated by cowardice or just stupidity? Ever since the accession of Fat Dave, Professional Conservatives have justified throwing their principles overboard with patronising lectures about the importance of electability. Now, suddenly there's the political equivalent of a £1,000 note lying on the floor and they're nowhere to be seen.

Are these guys genuinely afraid of losing the votes of the 'pro-home invasion' tendency? Have they become so thoroughly cucked that they're incapable of taking a stand even on the vexed question of whether to support law abiding householders over violent criminals? Or is that they're so far gone into a post-modern death spiral, and so obsessed with focus groups, push polls and microtargeted Facebook ads that they've lost all touch with reality?

Who knows? But at least we can hope to be spared any more lectures about the Very Special Political Genius of Professional Conservatives.

Govt Minister Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Namely, testosterone.

Needless to say, the Usual Suspects have taken it calmly and rationally: 

But his comments have sparked a row after the former director of public prosecutions Lord MacDonald branded the remarks 'juvenile'.

Uh oh...I understand that if Gavin Williams doesn't withdraw his comments, His Lordship might escalate to calling him 'dreadfully suburban' or 'frightfully common'.

But it's not just lords calling out this guy. Nope, there's also a ladyship too. That's what counts as egalitarian in the modern Labour Party: nobles of both sexes (I guess we'll have to wait to hear from the other 72 genders).

Apparently, these comments are outrageously outrageous but the only people the MSM can find to denounce them have never been elected dog catcher. Meanwhile, people with the need for actual votes are strangely unavailable for comment.

That's why this is important. Obviously, a policy of killing the fox before it gets in the hen house is the right thing to do, and also a certain vote winner, but it also exposes the central myth of cuckservatism. We're told that professional conservatives have to pander to freaks like Shameless Shami for the sake of electability but when a conservative finally tells these people to shove it, Labour MPs suddenly remember they've left the gas on at home. The extreme position turns out to be the one that no one who wants to be elected will argue against.