More Projection Than The Local Odeon....

Looks like crime's so low in the People's Republic of Caledonia that the McFilth have had to resort to policing hypothetical crime:

Police have been accused of targeting JK Rowling in a parody by inventing a fictional trans-hating character called Jo who believes 'they all belong in the gas chambers' in a hate crime scenario.

Yep, that would be the 'Jo' who's a massive Labour Party donor and Uber-Karen, but now they're trying to claim she's totally some demented liberal caricature of a right-winger.

Honestly, it's like a mashup of Taggart and the Self-Righteous Brothers. 

Still, I'm all about the equality me, so how about asking them what they would do if Jonathan 'India' Willoughby broke into Porton Down, stole anthrax spores and then hired an ice cream van and drove round south-east Inverness giving anthrax-laden 99s to passing school children while dressed as Amy Winehouse? 

Hey, you ever think about that one, PC McWoke? 

No? 

Will no one think of the imaginary children? 

Apparently, 'jihad' doesn't necessarily mean 'holy war' but everything the right says totally does - even if the rightists in question are identikit Guardian-reading bores like 'Jo'. 

Say, that sounds like something a bunch of creepy fanatics would use to try and bamboozle the public into supporting violent thuggery....

I mean I can't help noticing that all the actual, non-hypothetical, crimes appear to come from one side of the debate. 

Just who exactly is fantasising about herding their opponents into gas chambers, huh? 

They're not even hiding it anymore. A journalist for the BBC - of course - is openly fantasying about a 'Final Purge' - nudge, nudge, wink, wink - targeting people who [checks notes]... hate woke video games. 

Seriously, that's all it takes for a leftist to start fantasising about mass murder: not liking their rubbish, preachy games. 

These people are all nuts. 

I Shot A Man In Reno Just To Watch Him Die (And It's All Stephen King's Fault)

Liberals, true as ever to their motto 'being outraged about the wrong things since 1978', have decided that the real guilty party in the Brianna Ghey case is everyone who ever objected to a guy in a dress sharing a changing room with their six year old daughter. 

Although to be fair, I did think J K Rowling went a little too far in her book 'Harry Potter And The Creepy Tranny In A Terrible Wig'. 

Meanwhile, non-insane people note that the actual killers will be eligible for release in their mid-thirties i.e. still prime murdering age. 

I'm sure they'll be totally rehabilitated by then though.....

Note that not only did the jury not find that the killers were motivated by transphobia, the prosecution didn't even allege this - the judge herself decided to introduce this after the verdict was in.

You might say she decided to transition the case....

But wait, where are all the people who usually sermonise about muh sacred due process now  that a judge has suddenly decided that the whole trial thing is just a warm up act to her telling us what really happened? 

As it is, her reasoning seems.... well, let's just say I think there's a reason why she chose to wait to  introduce this until after no one could answer back:

'Your messages about Brianna were transphobic,' she told him. 'You consistently referred to her in a way that was dehumanising, calling her "it". You also described her as a "femboy thing".'

Wait... this guy sounds like me. 

Or, come to think of it, anyone else who rolls their eyes at the whole 'I identify as a cat' thing. 

And if you think that's weak, there's this:

While Jenkinson did not use transphobic language, she said it was the prosecution case that she 'encouraged' Ratcliffe to kill Brianna in the knowledge that his 'attitude' would make it more likely that he would go ahead and stab her

Huh? Hanging out with bigots who use insensitive language makes you a bigot too. How about if they work under you in some kind of group? Let's say there's some hypothetical guy - we'll call him Sir Keith Stoller - and some of the people who work under him are a bunch of raving antisemitic nuts? Is he responsible for any crimes they do too? 

Still, we have to look on the bright side of all this: at least motivation is back in play as something we're allowed to talk about. 

Hey, if we're allowed to trawl through some scumbag's text messages to work where he's coming from, we're surely free to do a deep dive into other cases... like, say, the Nottingham Horror. 

Right, liberals? 

Nope, guess not. 

The killer was sane enough to arm himself, conceal the weapon, travel into town, strike at the time of day when the police response was likely to be slowest, lie in wait for his victims and target only a specific demographic but too crazy for us to be able to ever understand why he targeted the people he did. 

Could be literally anything, you guys!

Naomi Campbell: The Only Black Liberals Ever Wanted To Jail

I have only three questions:

1/ How did the hell did we get in a situation where a freak show collection of unelected tranzi tossers could demand freeborn British citizens abase themselves before their crappy tribunals?

2/ Are celebs going to be more or less likely to take part in charidee events in future knowing that if they do, they risk being hauled before a kangaroo court years after the fact?

3/ If Charles Taylor really is that bad, what does it say about St Nelson of Mandela that he invited him to stop by?

.....

Thena again, maybe Naomi got off lightly getting a few rocks - I hear Nelly and his pals usually go with the whole necklace.

Victory In Iraq!

Yep, guess the fighting must be over.

It's not clambering for position over the bodies of better men, it's moral authority, right?