Another £1,000 Note Left Lying On The Ground

Labour may have signed up for Lockdown4Eva but at least Sir Kneelalot has found someone who does deserve freedom: this guy. 

Pitchfork, 61, raped and murdered 15-year-olds Lynda Mann and Dawn Ashworth in the 1980s - and is now due to be released on parole.   

Sir Keir told LBC Pitchfork had 'served a long sentence and he served the sentence imposed on him by the court, and under our system that means there comes a point at which he has to be released'. 

First things first: you'd think a former prosecutor would know that life terms have a minimum tariff, not a maximum one. 

Equally, isn't this the guy who wants to ban 'conversion therapies'?

Yep, apparently, sexual orientation is fixed (when it's one liberals approve of) but also fluid (when it's one they don't). 

So, you know, you can tell it's all totally based on hard science. 

Tony Blair had the 'People's Princess', now his successor has the 'People's Paedo'. 

Truly, when it comes to judging the public mood, he has the sure touch of Captain Hook. 

The cliché is to call this sort of thing virtue signalling, but is it really? It's more like a banker setting fire to a £50 note in front of a homeless guy. They're happy to talk about the importance of releasing degenerate predators, but they know full well their kids will never end up living next door to Mikey Murderpants. 

Meanwhile, suggest to actual voters that we need to carefully balance the rights of innocent children with those of homicidal perverts and see what happens. This is not really a tough issue for anyone outside the Woketopia of north London. 

And again I return to a familiar point: the sheer bogusness of the Cringe Cons. The David Cameron wing of the Tory Party keeps claiming that they're totes conservative, you guys, but they just think the Tories need to tone it down to reach out to centrists. Hence, the jettisoning of conservative principles all through Fat Dave's reign of error. 

Yeah, OK.

Well, here's where all the votes are on the right - at least if you define 'not releasing dangerous savages' as right wing - and these guys are AWOL. 

They should be airdropping copies of Starmer's statement into every marginal constituency in the land, but no: they're all about electabilty right up until it means losing dinner party invitations. 

'Shut Up' They Explained

I'm not saying that all the cash flowing into the Formerly Beautiful Game has given these guys megalomania, but the FA has just gone after Her Majesty's Government. 

Apparently, the FA is butt hurt that their customers aren't prepared to sit there like lemons while a bunch of multi-millionaire douchebags assail them for their white privilege, and so they want HMG to.... do something. 

It's the modern left everybody!  They've gone full 'Producers'. 

This is all further proof of the Great Realignment. Now it's the left that doesn't think the common rabble should be allowed to answer back to their betters. 

There's another obvious point here though: the FA claims the Government is taking the populist position, but also that the people booing are a tiny minority of nuts. 

Huh? 

How does that even work?

I'm guessing - much like a certain referendum I could mention - we're talking a lunatic fringe majority. 

Either that, or the FA means a 'tiny minority' of the people in North London. 

Hey, with a by-election coming up, I'm not sure reminding people that the left wanted to toss out the votes of 52% of the country is really the killer line they think it.  At this point, there's a good case for the FA to have to register its attack on the Government as a campaign contribution to the Tories. 

Here's the thing though. Too many people on the right are getting drawn into talking about the specifics of what BLM support and the wider history of Marxism. It's more simple than that. 

We've been told for years that 'if someone thinks something is racist, then it is'.

Hey, it's a stupid rule, but it's the left's rule. It's what they've proclaimed right up until two minutes ago. Now we're talking about anti-white racism, suddenly they claim it's only racist if the Central Committee on Racism sign off on it. 

Apparently, it's meant to be significant that the people who want to make a racist gesture at a football match have denied that the gesture in question is racist. 

Yep, they've really gone with the old 'I'm not racist but...'.

Say, I wonder if  'some of their best friends are white'?

That's the point the right needs to be hammering home. The left has reversed pretty much everything they said for the last twenty years, just to attack the white working class, and yet no one's calling them out on this