While the Libs try and convince us that it someone else who spent all that time telling us that 'Islamic terrorism' was a myth conjured up by the BushChimpler, his poodle Tony and the VRWC, let's revisit the words of one of Britain's top Liberals:
The point is that Lord Loony didn't come out with these comments after a heavy night on the claret. No, this was one of the nation's law lords, speaking while striking down terrorism legislation (for the nth time). Or, to put it another way, one of the nation's top judges was sitting on the bench with a double-layer of tin foil under his wig. Maybe we need an enquiry into how these kooks get on the bench in the first place ?
Here's the essential difference between Left and Right. The Left's theory goes something like this: MI-5 detected the July 7 bombers, something, something, something, and so they let them attack unhindered. Meanwhile, we on the Right argue that it was the determination of moonbat judges to give, and keep giving, known terrorists 'access all areas' passes for Britain - even to the point of carving absurd 'human rights' out of whole cloth - that meant that MI-5 was swamped to the point where there were no resources left to deal with apparently peripheral figures like the July 7 bombers. But don't expect the MSM to refer to that version of events - after all, it's a little 'out there' for them.
The real threat to the life of the nation, in the sense of a people living in accordance with its traditional laws and political values, comes not from terrorism but from laws such as theseQuick - someone phone Lenny and ask if terrorism is a real threat yet. Needless to say, this insanity was immediately hailed by the Left as their own version of Henry V's speech at Agincourt (but better!). Apparently, Liberals take a tough line on terror the same way they support the troops, namely by doing the exact opposite to what any sane person would recommend.
The point is that Lord Loony didn't come out with these comments after a heavy night on the claret. No, this was one of the nation's law lords, speaking while striking down terrorism legislation (for the nth time). Or, to put it another way, one of the nation's top judges was sitting on the bench with a double-layer of tin foil under his wig. Maybe we need an enquiry into how these kooks get on the bench in the first place ?
Here's the essential difference between Left and Right. The Left's theory goes something like this: MI-5 detected the July 7 bombers, something, something, something, and so they let them attack unhindered. Meanwhile, we on the Right argue that it was the determination of moonbat judges to give, and keep giving, known terrorists 'access all areas' passes for Britain - even to the point of carving absurd 'human rights' out of whole cloth - that meant that MI-5 was swamped to the point where there were no resources left to deal with apparently peripheral figures like the July 7 bombers. But don't expect the MSM to refer to that version of events - after all, it's a little 'out there' for them.
No comments:
Post a Comment