Join The Labour Party And See The World

It's the Animal Farm Travel Company.

Proof: Kirsty Wark Causes Global Warming

Kind of obvious, but wouldn't you like to see the figures for the BBC ?

"You keep using that word. I do not think it means, what you think it means."

File this under 'things only Liberals could say':

Surrey County Council, on behalf of the college, claimed the "strict anti-bullying policy" which was in place when Natashia was attacked "is effective", but also said there were "a number of incidents" of bullying involving the victim.

EU Sluts

Reading this over at EU Ref, I couldn’t help but think of Laban’s post about the British textile industry.

Worst Idea Ever

Impressed though I’ve been with the way Blair has somehow found himself on the right side of the War on Terror, there’s always been a feeling that this owes more to blind luck than anything else. Blair has never managed to articulate anything like a coherent explanation for why he thinks we need to fight. Obviously, he’s hemmed in by the very PC he did so much to promote, but still, claims that Blair ‘gets it’ seem awfully premature. And that’s before you think about his latest brilliant idea.

The big idea behind the Iraq operation was to offer the people of the Middle East a genuine choice other than repressive dictatorship or Islamolunacy. In so far as Syria is in Class A and Iran in Class B, neither has anything to gain and everything to lose from the successful establishment of a democratic Iraq. Hence, why they’ve been going full throttle to strangle it at birth. Blair's apparent failure to understand why Iraq is so vital is one thing, but his belief that the thugs and fanatics can be bought off is indicative of a man utterly failing to grasp the nature of the enemy.

100% Rubbish

It is generally true that while Conservatives have at least a vague idea what the Left believes, Liberals don’t have a clue about Conservatism. For proof of that, consider C4’s ‘100% English’. This was the latest in a long line of programs in which English (always English) people have their DNA tested, producing the revelation that many British people have foreign ancestors.

In case you’re wondering, this is supposed to be devastating for the Right. I understand future programs will debunk global warming sceptics by proving that fire is hot, and counter Christianity by showing that religious people still die.

For the benefit of any hard-of-thinking Liberals, I’ll spell it out: the Right doesn’t support Britain because it believes in a deranged 19th Century view of racial purity. It supports Britain because it believes in British culture, the British way of life and the things that make Britain so, well, British. Like the bald bloke says, you may like it, you may not, but this is where the debate is at, not some insane Liberal caricature of lunatics with genealogy charts.

A Hero For Our Times

Amongst the top 1000 or so annoying things about Liberals is not only their reflexive contempt for Britain and its institutions, but also their insistance that this is proof of their own awe inspiring courage. Look at John Snow. He’s not wearing a poppy. How very radical! Except that’s not enough for him, no, he has to tell us that in doing so, he's bravely battling the forces of oppression, or as he puts it ‘poppy fascism’. Using that phrase while flicking a v-sign towards those who fought actual fascism just shows how far down the rabbit hole the Left has gone.

Reality TV

I don’t want turn this into IainDaleSucks.com, but one of his posts shows a truly Hollywoodesque lack of self-awareness. He’s worried about the EU’s attempts to regulate the ‘Net, and more particularly by a Tory MEP’s weasely response to it.

Yep, He’s worried that a Tory politician is proving to be worthless in defending liberty and standing up to the EU. Hello ? Hey, this is a guy who really has all but turned his blog into UKIPsucks.com, but here he is with a perfect exemplar of what they were on about. This is exactly why people don’t trust the Tories, yet A-lister Dale was onboard with all this, right up until it was his ox being gored. It’d be great if the penny’s dropped, but I wouldn’t hold my breath.

Saxons Baffled As Dane Demands More Geld

Another week, another Class A-list disaster. Not content with being put on the A-list, Ali Miraj has demanded he be given a safe seat in Parliament, and no, none of your pesky ‘target seats’ will do. He wants an ‘access all areas’ pass and he wants it now! And why does he have this feeling of entitlement ? Well, he’s already contested a no-hoper and a marginal, he’s on a couple of Party committees and, no kidding, he’s got ‘professional experience as a Chartered Accountant.’

Yep: Mr Diversity is claiming he should be selected because he’s yet another Party hack. Huh ? If you want to see the sheer moral bankruptcy of the whole race hustling thing summed up, this is it: a yuppie scum accountant claiming he represents an under-represented demographic. When oh when will thirty-something Metropolitan professionals have a voice in this country ?

Needless to say, the Great Man conforms exactly to the stereotype of the Cameroonatic, in that he’s ticked every box but hasn’t signed anything. His CV isn’t just perfect, it’s perfectly sterile. You just know if you asked him for the time, he’d tell you it was ‘too early to say’. Indeed, he sums up perfectly what’s wrong with the Cameron Party when he claims he should become an MP because he’s fulfilled all the criteria. Nothing about a desire to serve, no ideology to push, nope – he’s collected all the tokens, so now he wants the free toy.

In his own way, Miraj sums exactly where British politics has gone wrong. He has an impressive record of hackery, but what else ? Why exactly should he be placed in a position of power over his fellow citizens ? For that matter what does he want to be an MP for ? All that need be said about his principals is that he quotes ‘family friends’ suggesting he’d have been better off in the Labour Party. Somehow, I can’t see many people suggesting to a young Margaret Roberts that she should try Labour.

But there’s something more. Let’s flip this round. Native Britons are constantly being harried over their use of ‘insensitive language’, but here’s a guy who’s come out and called the British Right racists. Never mind that’s it’s a gift to the Left he claims to oppose, surely the yin to the yang of paranoia about racism is that people who use bogus charges of racism should also face opprobrium ? After all, what his position boils down to is a charge that them pesky whites can’t be trusted to deal fairly with people. Racist, much ? In so far as any Right winger who suggests that multi-culturalism hasn’t brought about a new Golden Age is accused of being a BNP sympathiser, what’s with a Tory A-lister who sounds like he’s recruiting for Al-Quaida ?

It takes a certain degree of chutzpah for Miraj to complain about the ethnic angle, when that is his main qualification for the A-list in the first place. Take that away and what we’re left with is another party hack, but there’s a wider issue here. The A-list was justified as the Tory’s attempts to reach out to the supposedly disenfranchised and underrepresented. Now it turns out that the Tories’ idea of an underrepresented group is chartered accountants. This isn’t a one-off, take the example of House of Dumb heroine Margo James, millionaire ex-City flack and now supposed representative of ‘female games teachers’ in Blackpool.

For all the rhetoric, the only people the Tories appear to have ‘reached out’ to are the already privileged and connected. Far from being an attempt to broaden the Party’s demographics, the A-List has been used to pack it with Cameron Clones – but multi-coloured, omni-sexual ones! Hence why the A-list has more councillors from Kensington & Chelsea on it than from the whole of North-West England plus Yorkshire. That wouldn’t matter so much if the Party was committed to a policy of strict meritocracy, but for a group of people who claim to be obsessed with creating a party that looks like Britain, it does ram the point home.

Profiling!

It turns out airlines can profile after all. Not polar explorers returning home after a seven hour holiday, of course - that'd be stupid. No, it's a far more sinister pattern of behavior they're looking for.

Hey - I don't know about you guys, but I'm feeling alientated. Not to say appalled, agitated and angry. It's taking all my self-control not to strap explosives to myself and blow up a bus.

Actually, I am kind of teed off. You simply can't make a case for this kind of profiling without also making the case for anti-terrorist profiling, yet such is the intellectual death spiral of our culture that we'll treat enemy combatants attempting to destroy an airliner full of people better than Joe Bloke jetting home.

Perfect!

Return Of The Curse Of Call Me Dave Again Part II

Looks like the puffy-faced reptile has done it again. Truly, he is the closest British politics has to an Angel of Death. Just as he completes his purging of social conservatives from the Party, even Liberals are starting to admit that maybe all kinds of relationship aren't 'special' after all.

More Very Complex Stuff

It’s a good rule of thumb that when a Liberal claims something is very complex that means he’s been caught bang to rights. As ever, the perfect examplar of this is the BBC.

For the past two years, the BBC has been holding off on reporting on the death of Kriss Donald until they found a way they could write it off as a suicide, albeit doubtless a very complex one. Now, with the conviction of three ‘Asians’, even the BBC recognises the game is up. Hence, the sudden switch to Plan B.

Suddenly, the BBC is thinking deeply about the whole question of ‘racist murder’. Apparently, hate crimes are:

a largely subjective crime - and one which has proved extremely difficult to prove beyond reasonable doubt…Trying to unravel the motivation behind a crime is always difficult. Was a kick or a punch in a violent robbery any harder because of the victim's skin colour?.

The funny thing is that this was never a problem back in the day. The BBC justified the grossly disproportionate amount of coverage given to the near simultaneous slayings of Anthony Walker and Richard Whelan, by citing the definitely racial nature of the Walker killing. No trouble there ‘unravelling the motivation’ – and that only days after the slayings, not after a full trial.

What it’s really about is yet another Liberal idiocy running headlong into reality and coming off worst:

Racism was once defined as "prejudice plus power" - a definition which, in a British context, has tended to exclude all but the white population.

To quote one of the commentators at B-BBC, shouldn’t that read ‘in a Marxist context’ The Kriss Donald case throws this kind of rubbish into sharp relief. We’re talking about a hideous, racist killing, so where are our PC guardians of public morals ?

This is the race relations industry exposed. It turns out that they’re just fine with racism after all. All this PC posturing is just a means to push their culturally Marxist agenda. Those crimes which help this agenda get the full hit, those that don’t disappear down the memory hole, and if they’re too big to fit, they get the BBC explaining that the case is very complex.

Poetry Is Evil

Liberals are pretending to be outraged again, so I guess that means someone’s committed a crime against PC. Ah yes. A 'racist' poem.

Now that’s not a phrase you hear every day.

Liberals are so busy being outraged that they haven’t got round to saying why exactly it’s racist. True, it mentions Pakistanis, but not in a specifically racial way (in fact, there are US versions that mention Mexicans). The author isn’t criticising Pakistanis, he criticising an immigration system that involves throwing money at any idiot who can make it to Heathrow. The poem would work just fine if it mentioned Martians.

Needless to say, in so far as the girly hysteria was entirely predictable, the Tory concerned must have rocks for brains to get caught up in this. But hang on a mo’ – what’s with the leadership’s sudden chorus of ‘who let her in ?’. She was an A-Lister, a Grade A, Cameron-Approved, Fast-Track Superwoman, ready to be foisted on some innocent constituency. What does that say about Cameron’s Cloning Facility ?

Nevertheless, there is something that sticks in the throat hearing the party of Jenny Tonge and Chris Davis denounce racism. Sure they were demoted, but they still kept their jobs. Come to think of it, it’s a double whammy. After all, if everyone has the right to move to Britain then, hey, surely no one can object to the Jews moving to Palestine ? After all, it’s not like they expect Hamas to give them a free house, so what’s the Liberal Scumocrats’ real beef ?

But there’s something deeper here. The charge against the poem is that by mocking our train wreck immigration system, it is, by definition, racist. That’s what all parties are tacitly endorsing when they compete to come up with the most hysterical denunciation. So think that one over. Now, it’s not only racist to oppose open borders immigration, it’s racist to oppose open wallet immigration too. Or, to put it another way, if you don’t believe everyone on the planet has the right to fly to Britain and demand we give them a boat load of cash, the mainstream parties think you’re racist scum.

Hey, if nothing else, could the MSM stop referring to those of us who oppose current immigration policy as ‘extremists’, at least until we get some actual evidence that a majority of people outside the Westminster Village support our ‘everyone welcome’ policy ? Right now, I’m thinking the fact none of the mainstream parties will admit to even supporting ‘open borders’ kind of suggests that critics of this policy can’t be too fringe after all.

In so far as there is now no mainstream party that doesn’t think we should greet immigrants with open wallets, this is something of a gift to the BNP. Of course, Liberals will want to denounce Nasty Nick’s Party, but how can they ? If they’re going to use up all the rhetoric on people who don’t think we should be letting former Rwandan militia men into the country, what words do they have left for people who really do think DNA is destiny ?

They're Asking For It

Joking apart, it looks like the Left really has finally mustered a response to the Mad Mullah of Sydney’s defence of gang rape. Leading off is Aussie Lefty Suzanne Bassette, with a nice attempt at deflection.

Of course, this line of argument doesn’t even stand up on its own merits. People who don’t have 5-lever deadlocks and window locks are more likely to get burgled than people who do, but that doesn’t mean they made the burglars rob them. But even to engage with that argument is to let the Islamopaths off the hook.

Liberals have tried to blur the issue by claiming that the Mad Mullah was talking about immodest dress and the like. Hardly – let’s hear from the alleged man himself:

If one puts uncovered meat out in the street, or on the footpath, or in the garden, or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, then the cats come and eat it, is it the fault of the cat or the uncovered meat?

The uncovered meat is the problem! If it was covered the cat wouldn't have. It would have circled around it and circled around it, then given up and gone.
If she was in her room, in her house, wearing her hijab, being chaste, the disasters wouldn't have happened.

That's my emphasis by the way. No room for misquote there – and no generalised references to skimpy clothing either. Women who fail to wear a specifically Islamic piece of regalia deserve to be raped. A woman can –literally – dress like a nun, but she’s still a valid target to an Islamopath.

I’ll take this slow, just in case any Liberals are reading. This guy isn’t analogues to some geriatric judge explaining that women who wear short skirts are ‘asking for it’. He’s not stating that it would be imprudent or dangerous for a woman to dress immodestly, he’s claiming that it’s OK to rape all Infidel women. Come to think of it, things aren’t looking too good for those ‘moderate Muslims’ who Liberals claim are so thick on the ground (not that that doesn’t mean that the choice to wear the veil isn’t entirely voluntary).

All of which neatly debunks the Left’s other angle of attack, namely the claim that Islamopaths are the real victims here. Hey, if members of a death cult believing they have the right to rape non-members doesn’t strike Liberals as being something worth criticising, just what are they waiting for ?

Voting With His Backside

I always enjoy US campaign season. There’s a vibrancy and commitment to the whole thing that makes a refreshing change from the Westminister Village’s incestuous posturefests.

Still, not everyone likes American style. Tory A-Lister Iain Dale is just appalled – appalled I tell you – by Vernon Roberts’s ad. Not that he actually gets round to telling us why. Like we can’t guess. See, that’s strike one there. Does Iain Dale really think the rest of us are too stoopid to guess what’s really motivating him ?

Then there’s the humbuggery of it all. Iain Dale and the rest of the Pink Wedge spent years yammering about ‘tolerance’, but now they’ve got the whip hand, anyone who doesn’t like Kylie gets the extra-special snark with added snark.

But let’s not let the superficial humbuggery of ID’s position blind us to the deeper humbug. The Pink Wedge claims gays need to be represented by gays but how does that work ? In a PR-based system you could indeed have ‘gay MPs’, ‘black MPs’ or even ‘RPG geek MPs’, but in a constituency-based system the rest of the voters in any given place are quite within their rights to say ‘well, who’s representing us then’ ?

This is not a problem if we’re just talking about an MP who nails blokes as a hobby, as it were, but here’s Iain Dale taking against Vernon Roberts precisely because of his views on you-know-what. His sexuality isn’t a side-issue, it’s the driver of his views here. What confidence can, say, social conservatives or the religious have in the prospect of being represented by Dale ?

The Litmus Test

They took some time, but the Left has finally managed to muster a response to the Mad Mufti of Sydney’s defence of gang rape. Here’s Glenys Kinnock:

We know Muslims are Neanderthal in their attitudes, but it is absolutely terrifying that Sheik Hilali can fly in the face of what we have worked and fought for, to establish equal opportunities and rights for women.

He cannot strut around saying things like that.

Meanwhile,

Liberal Democrat MEP leader Chris Davies said: "It looks like it is time for a ride back to the 7th Century on the Muslim time machine, to the golden age of women's rights and opportunities.

While the Treason Party’s Hampshire MEP Chris Huhne offers this thought:

With this statement Muslims are taking the world back decades to an age where women had few if any rights or opportunities.

No, no: just kidding. All the above statements were made about UKIP MEP Godfrey Bloom, when he joked about women cleaning behind the fridge. Could there be a better metric for the degeneracy of modern Liberalism than the contrast between the hysteria that greeted Bloom’s joke and the deafening silence when faced with a guy who defends gang rape ?

Hey, it’s not even as if the Left doesn’t have a history of going overboard when discussing rape. DSD points out just how loony some Leftys can be, but now we have someone who’s as bad as they always said men were ? ‘This office is now closed. Please call again after Hell freezes over’.

FrontPage magazine reminds us just how blatantly the Left has covered for Islamofascist rapists. Well, of course they have. The whole of the Liberal worldview is based on the idea that everything is infinitely malleable, that the only true evil is believing in evil. Now, they’re faced with absolute barbarism. What can all their finger in the air intellectualism avail them now ?

The central belief of modern Liberalism is that we have reached a point in human history where 2+2 can equal 5, if only we give all the power in the world to really smart people like them. Sooner or later, that type of thinking always leads to disaster, but nothing throws it into sharp relief like absolute savagery. The Islamopaths believe they have a, literally, God-given right to rape Infidel women. What middle ground do the Left think we should find with feral predators ? How should we ‘reach out’ to perverted thugs ?

Liberals have no answer to these questions because all Liberal’s supposed sophistication amounts to is a polysyllabic form of moral nihilism and self-hatred. The people hunting feral savages are as bad as the savages themselves. Western civilisation is as bad as an ideology that calls for the rape of unbelievers. Everything is the same as everything else, except when the West is worse.

Politics is full of grey areas where ideology and reality meet head-on, where compromises must be made and the best is the enemy of the good. This isn’t one of them. We’re talking about gang rape here, but the Left’s hoping the issue goes away. This is the state of modern Liberalism.

A Woman’s Right To Choose

Who’d have thunk it ? So when all those Liberals were writing about how a women should be allowed to wear what she wants, they were talking about a women who wasn’t allowed to wear what she wanted. Who says Libs have no sense of irony ?

It don’t get any easier than this. The Islamopaths claimed that women actually wanted to wander round in tents, but it turns out they can’t even front up one happy camper without invoking Islamic law and all that that implies.

There’s a lesson to be learned here. How can I put this ? Ah yes, the Right was right. Again. The Left were, at best, duped by misogynistic thugs. Hey – it could happen to anyone (but it seems to happen to them a lot). Let’s leave aside the question of whether professional jounalists have any responsibility to carry out ‘due diligence’ and just ask where’s the follow-up ? Liberals moralise about the Right all day, but now they’ve been caught carrying water for a bunch of savages, what do they say ? Ah no, down the memory hole it goes – and takes the last shreds of their moral authority with it.

Mysteries Of Our Time

Well, OK, if it’s not slanted, how come we never hear of groups of right-wingers coming out in support ?

Arsonists Warn Of Dangers To Firemen

In case you’ve missed the BBC’s 24-7 coverage, the SNP and Plaid Cymru a.k.a. the Celtard Twins have taken time out from proving that cancer is caused by the English to call for an inquiry into the Iraq war, ‘cause y’know, if it had been handled differently, they’d have been right behind it. Apparently, they support the type of nationalism which involves abasing yourself before Third World lunatics. Maybe we should point out that some of the soldiers being killed are English ?

Needless to say, the Treason Party is right behind them. It really is more than flesh and blood should have to bear seeing a bunch of skanky, snivelling, socialist, surrender weasels break off from five years doing all but camping outside the US Embassy chanting ‘Bin Laden is gonna win!’ to claim that they’re worried about how the war’s being fought.

In any sane world these freaks taking out an onion for our fighting men would be enough to score them the rosette for ‘Sleaziest in Show’, but now we’re in the Call Me Dave dimension and the Tories are also backing calls for an inquiry. Not that they’re standing shoulder to shoulder with the moonbats, no sir, they just want to review the war. Well, Tories, you’re in luck – there happens to be a 646 strong committee already in place in central London, ready to review how things are going. Hell, I’ll even throw in a topic to get them started: the lousy armour on British vehicles, as documented extensively over here.

But no, the Tories have bent over backwards not to discuss the war in the house. It’s not even as if these equipment problems are the result of tough choices. There’s plenty of money for the European Rapid Reaction Force, also known Les Corps de l'Eléphant Blanc. But pointing that out might reopen Tory divisions over Europe, so it’s much safer to let the troops die, while claiming you want lessons to be learned just as soon as they become moot.

Meanwhile, Nu Lab claims this sort of thing demoralises the troops, as opposed to their policy of constant witch hunts for war crimes, which enthuses the troops no end. Call it a wild shot in the dark, but I’m guessing the troops have already noticed that their vehicles have the survivability of a Conservative in the Tory Party.

Of course, there is a serious point there. Having pond life like Plaid Cymru and the like stand up in the house and argue for a cut and run strategy can’t help but strengthen the enemy. It’s Bin Laden’s weak horse all over again. The trouble is that acknowledging that would require Labour to put the war in its proper context, and this they have refused to do. Instead, throughout the war Labour have acted as though the invasion of Iraq was approved on its own merits, instead of as a strategic move in the wider war on Islamofascism. Not only has this weakened support for the war amongst some people who should be strong supporters, but it’s left the way open for conspiracy nuts, for whom everything goes back to pointy-nosed fellows with silly hats.

Nu Labour’s reluctance to call the enemy what they are is all of a part with their reluctance to give the troops the equipment they need or protect them from legal harassment. To use a Clintonism, they went to war but they didn’t inhale.

This is exactly why the House should be holding the Executive to account, but instead the opposition is off in Neverland. The Treason Party and their Celtard mates are trying to find new ways to shout ‘surrender now’! And the Conservatives ? The Party of Churchill and Thatcher is desperately triangulating on the question of whether we should grovel to murderous savages. I don’t think it’s all that talk of inadequate air assets that explains why the terrorists feel so confident.