tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-61821192024-03-18T11:47:07.379+00:00House of DumbDJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.comBlogger3451125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-61661876636163633312024-02-29T09:37:00.003+00:002024-02-29T09:39:07.814+00:00Death Was By Blunt Language TraumaUh oh.... looks like Lee Anderson has fallen foul of people who'd never vote Tory anyway. <div><br /></div><div>Now they're going to not vote Tory <b>really </b>hard. They're going to not vote Tory to infinity plus one. After all, according to world-famous moderate Sadiq Khan, his language was inflammatory. <div><br /></div><div>Also inflammatory: <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13029929/Mike-Freer-QUITS-Veteran-Tory-justice-minister-arson-attack-stab-vest-death-threats-supporting-Israel.html">arson</a> </div><div><br /></div><div>Weirdly enough though, Moderate Sadiq Khan hasn't mentioned this yet. I guess it's just part and parcel of living in a big city.... which was the exact phrase he used to describe the slaughter of innocent civilians by terrorists. </div><div><br /></div><div>Say, I wonder if any of the hand-wringing cucks complaining about Lee Anderson's 'clumsy' language have anything to say about that? </div><div><br />I don't recommend holding your breath waiting for them to even mention it. </div><div><br /></div><div>That's the whole reason normal people are so stoked about what Lee Anderson said - we're just sick of being asked to believe in obvious absurdities. The people who are outraged about anyone criticising Islamism, but not people blowing up the No 52 bus are in no way moderates and what they support is in no way equality. More to the point though, a party that pretends there's something outrageous about pointing all this out is in no meaningful sense 'conservative'. </div></div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-56316692278990430122024-02-19T20:35:00.001+00:002024-02-19T20:36:45.708+00:00New Euphemism Just Dropped!Hey, I hate the lycra lice as much as anyone but I don't think the mode of transport is the <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13092869/Pictured-Boy-16-stabbed-death-Bristol-two-cyclists-wearing-masks-15-year-old-suspects-arrested-suspicion-murder-remain-custody.html">key issue here:</a><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><div><p class="mol-para-with-font" style="background-color: white; font-family: graphik, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px;"></p><blockquote><div style="background-color: white; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">Police have named the 16-year-old boy who was killed in a stabbing on Wednesday 'by two cyclists wearing masks'. </span><span style="background-color: transparent;"> </span></div></blockquote><blockquote><div style="background-color: white; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">The victim has been named as Darrien Williams, though formal identification is yet to take place, according to Avon and Somerset Police. </span><span style="background-color: transparent;"> </span></div></blockquote><blockquote><div style="background-color: white; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">He was attacked in Rawnsley Park in Easton by two people wearing masks who left the scene on bikes, before running to Stapleton Road where he was assisted by a motorist.</span></div></blockquote><p class="mol-para-with-font" style="background-color: white; font-family: graphik, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px;"></p></div><div>On the plus side, at least it's a change from 'talented footballer' or 'aspiring rapper'. </div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-40136060879465369162024-02-05T11:30:00.010+00:002024-02-05T15:13:56.456+00:00I Shot A Man In Reno Just To Watch Him Die (And It's All Stephen King's Fault)<div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><div>Liberals, true as ever to their motto 'being outraged about the wrong things since 1978', have decided that the real guilty party in the Brianna Ghey case is everyone who ever objected to a guy in a dress sharing a changing room with their six year old daughter. </div><div><br /></div><div>Although to be fair, I did think J K Rowling went a little too far in her book 'Harry Potter And The Creepy Tranny In A Terrible Wig'. </div><div><br /></div><div>Meanwhile, non-insane people note that the actual killers will be eligible for release in their mid-thirties i.e. still prime murdering age. </div><div><br /></div><div>I'm sure they'll be totally rehabilitated by then though.....</div><div><br /></div><div>Note that not only did the jury not find that the killers were motivated by transphobia, the prosecution didn't even allege this - the judge herself decided to <a href=" https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13037925/Brianna-Gheys-killers-jailed-life-Scarlett-Jenkinson-Eddie-Ratcliffe-languish-prison-42-years-evil-pair-considered-release-judge-says-murder-driven-transphobia.html">introduce this</a> after the verdict was in.</div><div><br /></div><div>You might say she decided to transition the case....</div><div><br /></div><div>But wait, where are all the people who usually sermonise about <i>muh sacred due process</i> now that a judge has suddenly decided that the whole trial thing is just a warm up act to her telling us what really happened? </div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">As it is, her reasoning seems.... well, let's just say I think there's a reason why she chose to wait to introduce this until after no one could answer back:</span></div><div><span style="background-color: white; letter-spacing: -0.18px;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><blockquote>'Your messages about Brianna were transphobic,' she told him. 'You consistently referred to her in a way that was dehumanising, calling her "it". You also described her as a "femboy thing".'</blockquote></span></span></div><div>Wait... this guy sounds like me. </div><div><br /></div><div>Or, come to think of it, anyone else who rolls their eyes at the whole 'I identify as a cat' thing. </div><div><br /></div><div>And if you think that's weak, there's this:</div><blockquote><div><span style="background-color: white; letter-spacing: -0.18px;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">While Jenkinson did not use transphobic language, she said it was the prosecution case that she 'encouraged' Ratcliffe to kill Brianna in the knowledge that his 'attitude' would make it more likely that he would go ahead and stab her</span></span></div></blockquote><div>Huh? Hanging out with bigots who use insensitive language makes you a bigot too. How about if they work under you in some kind of group? Let's say there's some hypothetical guy - we'll call him Sir Keith Stoller - and some of the people who work under him are a bunch of raving antisemitic nuts? Is he responsible for any crimes they do too? </div><div><br /></div><div>Still, we have to look on the bright side of all this: at least motivation is back in play as something we're allowed to talk about. </div><div><br /></div><div>Hey, if we're allowed to trawl through some scumbag's text messages to work where he's coming from, we're surely free to do a deep dive into other cases... like, say, the <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13005743/You-blood-hands-Barnaby-Webbers-family-furiously-slam-Nottingham-police-failing-arrest-triple-killer-Valdo-Calocane-stabbed-three-death-rampage.html">Nottingham Horror. </a></div><div><br /></div><div>Right, liberals? </div><div><br /></div><div>Nope, guess not. </div><div><br /></div><div>The killer was sane enough to arm himself, conceal the weapon, travel into town, strike at the time of day when the police response was likely to be slowest, lie in wait for his victims and target only a specific demographic but too crazy for us to be able to ever understand why he targeted the people he did. </div><div><br /></div><div>Could be literally anything, <i>you guys!</i></div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-52118535370391745302023-12-10T22:05:00.003+00:002023-12-11T09:41:59.658+00:00Hey, Liberals, Who's In An Echo Chamber Now? <div>For those of you keeping score at home, crazy extremist Nigel Farage got through to the final of 'I'm A Celebrity' while the guy foisted on the Tory Party by the supposed wizards of electability is on course for a record defeat. </div><div><br /></div><div>The smart set claims Rishi Sunak isn't worried about the contrast between the two of them, but it's noticeable he himself made sure to have a photo-op carrying out his own version of a bushtucker trial, being pictured with a really huge snake. </div><div><br /></div><div>No, wait, my mistake that was actually Michael Gove. Meanwhile, back in the real world, Farage was already meant to be dead and buried thanks to voice of the people <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-12788849/young-tiktok-sensation-stir-im-celebrity-itv-regretting-nella-rose-jungle.html">Nella Rose</a> - or as the public generally refer to her 'who'? </div><div><span face="graphik, Arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.16px;"><blockquote>Not only does Nella, 26, who is of Congolese descent, tick diversity boxes, but crucially her social media content — her hair and make-up video blogs are particularly popular — meant she already has millions of fans who follow her every move.</blockquote></span></div><div><i>She's the voice of a generation, you guys!</i></div><div><br /></div><div>Well, OK, then. Let's assume this angry and divisive race-hustling bum's rise to Tik Tok fame is totally kosher, even though, well, <a href="https://www.afr.com/world/asia/tiktok-can-radically-reshape-global-opinion-security-adviser-warns-20231205-p5ep6l">you know</a>, look what happened next:</div><div><p class="mol-para-with-font" style="background-color: white; font-family: graphik, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px;"></p><blockquote><p class="mol-para-with-font" style="background-color: white; font-family: graphik, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px;">It is no secret within ITV that Nella was viewed as a future face of the channel. She even signed up with agent Jonathan Shalit – known as a star-maker courtesy of managing Charlotte Church and Myleene Klass — in a bid to raise her profile.</p><p class="mol-para-with-font" style="background-color: white; font-family: graphik, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px;">Shalit also has strong relationships with ITV, having worked with Good Morning Britain hosts Susanna Reid and Kate Garraway in the past.</p><p class="mol-para-with-font" style="background-color: white; font-family: graphik, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px;">One insider at the broadcaster revealed: 'Nella was on the list for a while....</p><p class="mol-para-with-font" style="background-color: white; font-family: graphik, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px;">The idea was that that show, with its millions of viewers, would make her a household name and she would be handed lots of work by ITV</p></blockquote></div><div>Yep, she's not Rosa Parks, she's the Girls Aloud of politics, sticking it to The Man with the help of her handlers at Sticking It To The Man Ltd, a division of Smash The System PLC. </div><div><br /></div><div>Hey, we're all supposed to hate the 1970s comedians but at least those guys served a gruelling apprenticeship on the club circuit. Meanwhile, the MSM tries to push these grifting clowns down the public's throat, only for them to meltdown as soon as they have to deal with, actual, real people. </div><div><br /></div><div>There's a lesson in there for the Tories but I'm sure they'll pretend not to notice. </div><div><br /></div><div>They just need some targeted ads on Instagram, that'll change everything.<br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-58208131720205226022023-11-13T21:56:00.003+00:002023-11-13T22:17:04.172+00:00Moby The Dick Resurfaces!No, Reader, despite what it looks like, that was <b>not</b> a beached whale in Downing Street earlier today. It was just Fat Dave Cameron making his return to government. <div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><div><br /></div><div>Apparently, his job will be to represent British interest abroad - as opposed to his last job which was to represent foreign interests in Britain. At least that's what it seemed like at the time. </div><div><br /></div><div>There is no better proof of what a worthless scumbag this guy is than that the MSM has been lauding his statesman-like qualities all day, but without being able to cite anything specifically statesman-like about Blabba The Hut. </div><div><br /></div><div>Nope, Snooty Dave's statesman-like qualities are much like Kierdo the Weirdo's forensic analytical skills - something only visible to the MSM. </div><div><br /></div><div>As a basic requirement, shouldn't a certified super genius be able to come up with at least one or two memorable statements? </div><div><br /></div><div>And no, not memorable in the sense of being 0 for 2 in naming who fought in the Battle of Britain. </div><div><br /></div><div>Meanwhile, back in the real world, this prat's main contribution to Britain was to so completely fold in his dealings with the EU that he inadvertently helped Leave win. </div><div><br /></div><div>And then there was him pushing the well-planned and thought out intervention in the Libyan civil war that helped make modern-day Libya the Canada of Africa. </div><div><br /></div><div>This - <b>this</b> - is what genius at work looks like!</div><div><br /></div><div>On the other hand, we're told he will help the Tories win back the 'middle ground' - you know, all those people who were totally going to vote Tory but they were put off by the Tories being too hard on jihadist loons. </div><div><br /></div><div>Who'd have thunk it, huh? Apparently you're now a Nazi lunatic if you <i>don't</i> want to kill the jews. </div><div><br /></div><div>But let's not let the insanity of this specific issue blind us to the bogusness of the whole premise. Apparently, Lord Snooty is a political super genius but where exactly is this election-winning genius parked? In two elections he faced the one-eyed doomster from Fife and then an early AI system's attempt at generating a character from a Woody Allen movie and overall he managed an aggregate majority of 12 seats. </div><div><br /></div><div>Truly an unstoppable electoral titan! </div><div><br /></div><div>Meanwhile, in 2019 when the Tories went into an election with a supposedly extreme offering - you know, actual conservatism - they won an 80 seat majority. </div><div><br /></div><div>There is no more ludicrous myth in British politics than the idea that it's the right of the Tory Party that hobbles the Party's election chances. For all that the squish side of the Party like to talk about electability, they sure do seem to struggle to actually get elected. </div><div><br /></div><div>On the plus side, at least Snooty doesn't have any skeletons in the closet.</div><div><br /></div><div><a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/business-67401551">Oops. </a></div><div><br /></div><div>And that's the real problem, not only with this fraud, but with our whole political class: here's a guy who struts round like some kind of blue-blooded Ubermensch, looking down his nose at the common rabble, except now it turns out he a grifting low-life who talks in vacuous sound-bites and couldn't even empty water out of a boot if you put the instructions on the heel. </div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-74257373974204250572023-10-18T10:22:00.001+01:002023-10-18T10:33:30.658+01:00Courage Under No Fire Whatsoever<div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><div>Good news everyone! We've finally found a way to stop leftists hijacking the (formerly) Beautiful Game to push their <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12626385/Football-Association-Wembley-arch-Ukraine-Israel-Hamas.html">stupid talking points: </a></div><div><span face="graphik, Arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.16px;"><blockquote>Senior executives reportedly fear doing so could be 'divisive' and don't want to be seen to be taking sides in the Middle East conflict.</blockquote></span></div><div>Yep, 'divisive'. Some say cutting the heads off babies is wrong, some say it's a good thing and, honestly, both sides make good arguments. </div><div><br /></div><div>Note that they had no problem previously pandering to the feminazis and the gaystapo. </div><div><br /></div><div>Never mind asking whether or not there's anything divisive about their individually loony agendas, the FA should see what happens when they get them both together to talk about the whole Transformers thing. </div><div><br /></div><div>I may be going out on a limb here but I'm pretty sure the whole scenario where Stevo is playing for a National League side, then changes his name to Chantelle and walks into a Woman's Super League team - let's just say that this may not be entirely controversy free. </div><div><br /></div><div>Then consider the flip side of all this. Sports journalists have spent years telling just how plain heroic people like Raheem Sterling are for complaining constantly about racism. We've been assured that multi-millionaire celebrities with huge endorsement deals are courageous for denouncing supposed white supremacy.</div><div><br /></div><div>Anyone who asks what exactly prats like Sterling are risking is <b>clearly</b> racist. Ditto, anyone pointing out that the MSM's ranting about the supposedly bigoted nature of football fans looks mightily like class hatred hidden behind PC posturing. But now we've got an issue that takes actual courage to speak out about and suddenly..... </div><div><br /></div><div>Nope, Sterling hasn't gone missing this fast since the last time he played in the Champions League. </div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-8542697310614234162023-09-25T10:48:00.003+01:002023-09-25T10:56:34.190+01:00Dixon Shrugged<div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><div>Say, did I miss anything? </div><div><br /></div><div>Last time I checked Sunak was an empty suit and Starmer was a slippery weasel sooo....guess not. </div><div><br /></div><div>In fact, so useless are our political class that even people on the Government's payroll are checking out. </div><div><br /></div><div><a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12555223/Now-army-sent-cover-Met-Police-firearms-officers-dozens-withdraw-protest-marksman-charged-murder-fatal-shooting-Chris-Kaba.html">Ruh oh! </a></div><div><br /></div><div>Reminder: 90% of the left's stupid ideas rely on them convincing their intended victims to allow themselves to be preyed on. Once actual sane people tell them to shove it, it all goes horribly wrong. </div><div><br /></div><div>It's a true mask off moment though. Apparently the ones who handed back their 'ticket' have been threatened with being deployed on Response teams i.e. patrolling around responding to emergency calls. </div><div><br /></div><div>In other words, <i>policing.</i></div><div><i><br /></i></div><div>That's it. That's how senior police officers think about actual policing: Siberia with junkies. </div><div><br /></div><div>And then there's the charming 'community':</div><div><span face="graphik, Arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.16px;"></span><blockquote><span face="graphik, Arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.16px;">The fatal shooting, which sparked mass protests from the black community including from British rapper Stormzy</span><span face="graphik, Arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.16px;"><a href="http://">,</a> led to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) launching a murder investigation. </span></blockquote></div><div>Say, I wonder when someone in the MSM is going to ask Stormzy and his pals about the <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12192845/Nottingham-rampage-Suspect-West-African-migrant.html">Nottingham Horror? </a></div><div><br /></div><div>Personally, I'm going with<span> </span> 'never' - unlike Mr Plod MSM journalists only shoot blanks these days. They'll probably hit Stormzy with a tough curve-ball like 'is it hard to be so awesome and yet so wonderful at the same time'? </div><div><br /></div><div>Ditto, legal leftists. If you threw a bucket of water over them at 4 AM they'd jerk awake sermonising about <i>muh sacred legal process</i>. Now it turns out that 'Independent Prosecutors' are only independent right up until Burn Loot Murder start doing what they do best, but the right is required to pretend not to notice there's a large elephant in the room and it's sitting right on top of the CPS. </div><div><br /></div><div>Hence why the Usual Suspects are outrageously outraged at Suella Braverman coming out in support of the police. Just like Stormzy and his pals, leftists want to be free to attack the right, but they're outraged that anyone fights back. </div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-39169474167122059862023-02-20T17:23:00.002+00:002023-02-20T17:32:43.882+00:00This Is Why Soldiers Invented Fragging...Ladies and gentlemen, I regret to inform you that Colonel Blimp is<a href="https://www.gbnews.uk/politics/are-we-having-a-serious-conversation-tory-mp-tobias-elwood-goes-public-in-blasting-sunak/441050"> at it again. </a><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><div><br /></div><div>Did you get that? We're a 'particular cohort' and a 'particular part of the spectrum' (<i>nudge, nudge, wink, wink) </i>who don't deserve to be involved in serious conversations. </div><div><br /></div><div>As ever, I note that if actual conservatives talked about anyone the way the cucks talk about conservatives, the cucks would be demanding they be jailed for hate speech. But that's not even it. 'Deputy Party Chairman' is neither here not there, it's just not that big a job. Meanwhile, in so far as the Prime Minister and Chancellor are both impeccably well-connected, smug globalists who have nearly as much contempt for the public as Blimp himself, aren't they both the very model of the Ellwoodian ideal? </div><div><br />Hey, how's that working out for that Party anyway? </div><div><br /></div><div>When is it time for a 'serious conversation' about why all the guys who talk constantly about <i>muh electability</i> don't appear able to win actual elections? </div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-56092224347624082262023-02-06T21:42:00.004+00:002023-02-10T14:45:51.627+00:00Rainbow Utopia Postponed Again!<div><i>Weird! </i>Despite the absence of any white men in leading roles, liberals still don't seem entirely happy with the outcome of the Mason Greenwood case. </div><div><br /></div><div>What can it all mean? </div><div><br /></div><div>Personally, my feelings on this are the same as my feelings about the <a href="https://houseofdumb.blogspot.com/2021/05/live-by-victimhood.html">Noel Clarke allegations</a>: in so far as the charges involve specific incidents in actual places with a known victim, they're approximately 10 bazillion times more credible than the average charge of <i>raaaaaycism </i>by his pals in the game. </div><div><br /></div><div>Still, on sauce for the goose grounds, I think it's fair to ask who <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9781467/Tyrone-Mings-says-Priti-Patel-stoked-fire-racism-labelling-taking-knee-gesture-politics.html">stoked <b>this </b>fire?</a> </div><div><br /></div><div>Hey, if disagreeing with a bunch of race-hustling lunatics makes you responsible for some loser tweeting naughty words, then I think it's fair to ask if the unhinged racist lunacy being pushed by St Raheem and his pals might in some way provoke violence against white people?</div><div><br /></div><div>Hey, I'm just asking! </div><div><br /></div><div>Which is more than anyone in the MSM is. Nope, the one time sports journalists really do have an excuse to look at wider issues, they've suddenly gone MIA. I guess they're all tied up heroically pointing out that <a href="https://houseofdumb.blogspot.com/2022/11/sports-journalists-are-journalists-of.html">foreign lands are foreign. </a></div><div><br /></div><div>Truly, these guys are fearless seekers after truth. </div><div><br /></div><div>On the plus side though, liberals have finally found a white guy to blame after all and, friends, It is<b> just too perfect!</b></div><div><br /></div><div>Yes, indeed, woke warrior extraordinaire Gary Neville has fallen foul of the loonies by.... <a href=" https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-11707131/Neville-apologises-clumsy-like-tweet-calling-Man-Uniteds-Greenwood-innocent-man.html?ico=related-replace">liking a tweet</a> by a former prosecutor pointing out how the law works. </div><div><br /></div><div>Hey, again, sauce for the goose. The sanctimonious twerp was happy to play witchfinder general when it suited him, now it's all gone a bit J K Rowling for him. </div><div><br /></div><div>Still, it is revealing. We were all supposed to admire his heroism in <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11344663/Football-pundit-Gary-Neville-sparks-fury-jibe-declaring-Conservatives-cancer-UK.html">attacking the righ</a>t. In fact, we were supposed to be so impressed by it all we weren't meant to ask what was actually courageous about it? What exactly was the risk in a media luvvie attacking conservatives anyway? Now suddenly the alleged tough guy and professional Northerner clashes with the left and he folds like a row of tents. That tells you who has the real power in modern Britain. </div><div><br /></div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-40463445938561575072023-01-16T21:28:00.001+00:002023-01-16T21:28:06.854+00:00Tate SpeechGrrrr.... really hacks me off that I have to defend <a href="https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/01/12/andrew-tate-and-the-hysteria-of-modern-feminism/">Andrew Tate</a>, considering that he's basically a circus clown pushing such an absurd caricature of masculinity that he may as well be working for Hilary Clinton.<div><br />Of course, there's the free speech angle, but there's something more than that going on. </div><div><br /></div><div>First things first though, if I was a <i>soi dissant</i> professional educator, I'm not sure I'd be going on TV to admit that even with five days a week to indoctrinate the kids, I still have less influence over them than some prat on the internet. Nevertheless, there they are, queuing up to tell us what the yoof really need is.... <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/education-64234568">MOAR INDOCTRINATION</a>.</div><div><br /></div><div>The phrase that come to mind is 'the beatings will continue until morale improves'. </div><div><br /></div><div><div>Honestly, they're like the stereotype English tourist shouting louder so the foreigners can understand him. </div></div><div><br />Still, we have to acknowledge that this prat has come out with some obnoxious stuff, like that time he joked about throwing acid into the face of female politicians. </div><div><br /></div><div>No, my mistake, that was Jo Brand talking about male politicians. </div><div><br /></div><div>Any schools going to take action against girls quoting her? Any at all? </div><div><br /></div><div>Nope, girls could stand in the playground reading from the Collected Works of Jess Philipps and nothing would happen to them. It's for<i> Teh Ekwalitee.</i> </div><div><br /></div><div>Boys see the basically fraudulent nature of all that and no amount of Very Special Assemblies will convince them to believe the feminazis instead of their lying eyes. </div><div><br /></div><div>Faced with this kind of double standards no wonder the boys look elsewhere. Say what you like about the Bozo in Bucharest but at least he's offering some kind of positive masculinity. </div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-9036365749808573602022-12-13T09:47:00.006+00:002022-12-13T10:10:49.544+00:00Get Woke, Go Home<div>Just checking: are the England football team still the flagship of Woke Britannia or nay? </div><div><br /></div><div>Nope, I guess it's a modern Cinderella story: the Woke Warriors went to the (foot)ball, but just on the stroke of the final whistle, they suddenly turned back into mice. </div><div><br /></div><div>Honestly, it's intriguing to watch the NPC update in progress. When they were winning, it proved wokeness was the way of the future and you needed to get with the Nu Brit program, <i>pal!</i> Now? Suddenly there are no wider conclusions whatsoever to be drawn from it all. </div><div><br /></div><div>For the record, reaching the quarter finals isn't all that. England managed it under the famously disastrous - so the MSM said - reign of Sven Goran Ericksson. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/England_at_the_FIFA_World_Cup">Twice. </a></div><div><br /></div><div>Say, how come the quarter finals are a disaster when it's the foreign guy in charge but success when it's a Brit. Sounds kind of..... xenophobic. </div><div><br /></div><div>But no, we all know why Slippery Southgate is off the hook. He's the Neil Ferguson of football. His politics are impeccable even if reality keeps letting him down. </div><div><br /></div><div>As <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPcAvJcjEMI">Paul Joseph Watson said</a>, they started on their knees and they went out on their knees. </div><div><br /></div><div>They supported Totally Not BLM, just happening to give exactly the same salute as BLM members and using the same rhetoric but different...somehow. </div><div><br /></div><div>Don't expect the MSM to ask them what it is they do support, if not BLM, though. They've spent years not asking 'caring' Marcus Rashford about his rumoured exotic tax affairs so they aren't about to ask anyone any difficult questions about what, say, 'inclusion' actually means anyway. </div><div><br /></div><div>Hey, if it wasn't for an ill-judged attempt at the sympathy vote following a burglary, they'd never have told us that Brother Raheem is <i>Keeping It Real</i> from inside a mansion in a gated community in Surrey.</div><div><br /></div><div>That's the thing right there. Brother Raheem ranting about sticking it to The Man, while his butler feeds him quail eggs on a silver platter isn't even in the top half of bad things these guys get up to. Modern football is a gold-plated sewer, and a smarter, more vigorous Tory Party - in short, one that actually considered 'electability' as something more than just an excuse to avoid any actual conservatism - would be making sure people remember that the left <i>chose</i> to embrace these guys. But no, apparently, expecting actual drive from the Tory Party is like expecting a guy on a six figure salary to be able to hit the goal from twelve yards. </div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-27749082227231133532022-11-20T22:42:00.007+00:002022-11-21T09:26:23.810+00:00Sports Journalists Are The Journalists Of Journalism<div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><div><i>All the unwarranted self-esteem but even lower IQs, you guys!</i></div><div><br /></div><div>Even these guys know they suck, hence why they're desperate to report on anything <b>except</b> sportsball. No, they all want to report on how some barely literate loser in Nuneaton tweeting the N-word at St Raheem of Sterling exposes the dark side of conservatives, Brexit, Brexitey conservatives and, basically, anything liberals hate. </div><div><br /></div><div>Now they're all claiming to be shocked - <i>shocked</i> - that a Middle Eastern country applies Islamic law. </div><div><br /></div><div>Well, either that or they've belatedly discovered that Islamists are not just Guardian reading liberals except with more impressive beards. </div><div><br /></div><div>Who could have known? Well, no one, except the right but every time we tried to warn them they claimed we were a bunch of barely literate losers who just want to tweet the N-word at St Raheem.</div><div><br /></div><div>Hey, MSM, who are the morons now, huh? </div><div><br /></div><div>These guys really are the living embodiment of the old line about people who stumble over the truth then pick themselves up and carry on regardless. Hey, it's either that or getting an actual 'job' and who needs that? </div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-56793871465467663052022-11-07T20:49:00.005+00:002022-11-07T20:52:42.488+00:00They Want Us Silenced, We Want Them To Speak UpSay, did I miss anything while I was tied up?<div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><div><br /></div><div>Nothing good, that's for sure.</div><div><br /></div><div>On the plus side, Becky from HR failed to become Tory leader for the second time so I can reuse my old joke about her self-identifying as PM. </div><div><br /></div><div>Also, we've finally found an immigrant from Africa who really is doing a job the locals just wouldn't do, namely cleaning up Twitter. </div><div><br /></div><div>Obviously Elon Musk buying Twitter is a good thing but it is kind of depressing that in just over a week he's fired more blue-haired loonies than the Tories have managed in twelve years. </div><div><br /></div><div>The cucks claim the Tory Party has to keep selling out its base to have any hope of winning elections. Meanwhile, liberals are panicking that they'll now no longer have thousands of commissars on Twitter censoring conservative thought. So apparently <i>soi dissant</i> conservatives claim they can't sell actual conservativism but liberals think they'll be swept aside once they have to face conservatives on a level playing field. </div><div><br /></div><div>They can't both be right!</div><div><br /></div><div>Personally, I think that - for possibly the first time ever - the liberals are right. Consider one of the Twitter accounts that enrages them above all others: Libs of TikTok. It's just what it sounds like, an account that showcases stuff liberals have posted on TikTok. You may think they'd be happy to have their stuff passed on to a wider audience....</div><div><br /></div><div>Reader, they are not. </div><div><br /></div><div>Libs of TikTok was subject to all manner of harassment from the old regime at Twitter - plus a whole bunch of real world trouble too. The same people who claim conservatives are creepy fringe weirdoes really don't like the public finding out what they really believe. </div><div><br /></div><div>That's the difference right there. Liberals want us no-platformed, we want them pro-platformed. We positively insist they speak out. If it was up to me I'd have them on TV 24/7 - the only caveat would be that they have to make their case on their own, with no sympathetic interviewer there to lob them softballs and keep them on the rails. Who wouldn't watch 'Riding With Raheem' - Raheem Sterling is driven round the country in a solid gold Rolls Royce meeting fellow race hustlers and accusing random farmers, postmen and plumbers of oppressing him with their white privilege? </div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-37552331908995624232022-07-21T08:46:00.002+01:002022-07-21T17:59:41.895+01:00Becky From HR Fails In Tory Leadership Bid<i>OMG!</i> Penny Mordaunt has, like, totally failed to become Tory leader. <div><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><div><br /></div><div><i>Nightmare!</i></div><div><br /></div><div>The good news is that she can still identify as a Tory leader, so there is that. </div><div><br /></div><div>On the down side, nearly 30% of Tory MPs actually voted for this walking NPC. </div><div><br /></div><div>There're the well-known controversies, like self-ID, but it's also clear that, once you get behind the vacuous public image, she has <a href="https://unherd.com/2022/07/penny-mordaunt-is-hard-to-read/">hidden shallows. </a></div><div><br /></div><div>The big advantage Becky has is that when she comes out with some leftist nonsense the leftism tends to distract people from the underlying absurdity of the statement. What does 'change is the engine room of equality' even mean anyway? It's like something from a woke fortune cookie.</div><div><br /></div><div>Apparently, Becky saw Liz Truss modelling herself on St Margaret and thought 'I'll do the same, except with Meghan Markle'. </div><div><br /></div><div>Again, this is what over a hundred Tory MPs voted for. These are the guys who don't think their members should have a vote until they've already whittled the candidates down to two. They say their party believes in trusting the people, but then they claim even their own members don't have the very special super genius required to select viable candidates. </div><div><br /></div><div>After all, the base might vote for some kook, instead of a proven vote winner, like the woman who wants Joe Voter's five year old daughter sharing a changing room with a woman with a beard (and lies about it even though she's on tape saying so), hangs out with jihadist nutcases and hates 'Dad's Army'. </div><div><br /></div><div>This, THIS, is what the voters are crying out for!</div></div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-69513515290620198682022-07-15T15:03:00.002+01:002022-07-15T18:42:40.943+01:00I Don't Think A New Leader Will Fix This...Start as you mean to go on you cucks!<div><br /></div><div>The Tory Party's first leadership debate is tonight and so naturally they've decided to hold it on GB News...</div><div><br /></div><div>No, just kidding, it's Channel 4. </div><div><br /></div><div>Of course it it. Why wouldn't you hold it on such a famously <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4644412/Did-Jon-Snow-shout-f-Tories-Glastonbury.html">unbiased channel</a>? </div><div><br /></div><div>Yep, <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7735367/Channel-4-ice-sculpture-Boris-Johnson-stage-snubs-debate.html">this one. </a></div><div><br /></div><div>Just to ram the point home, the moderator is <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krishnan_Guru-Murthy">Krishnan Guru-Murphy</a>, the sneery rich kid race hustler. </div><div><br /></div><div>And, seriously, if a born filthy rich, private school & Oxford educated Metro media lovey can't speak for the conservative base, who can? </div><div><br /></div><div>There's a serious point here. Why is the Tory Party giving credibility to a liberal cess pit like Channel 4 anyway? </div><div><br /></div><div>Nothing these people are involved in qualifies as 'journalism' by any reasonable definition. Expect ninety minutes of stupid gotchas, 'have you stopped beating your wife' and the loony obsessions of Metropolitan wokies. </div><div><br />The point is the modern Tory Party is useless as an ally and harmless as an enemy. They won't do anything to help their base but they'll pander to a bunch of smug North London prats who will never vote for them in a million years. </div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-8520026859364837982022-07-05T13:01:00.001+01:002022-07-05T17:45:54.939+01:00Rainbow Utopia Postponed Again<div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><div>Good news everyone! We've finally got the left to understand that not all claims of discrimination <a href="https://unherd.com/2022/06/americas-fake-caste-war/">are valid:</a></div><div><blockquote>In short, this survey was likely completed by individuals already
conscious of and concerned with prejudice and discrimination against [REDACTED I] in America. This does not invalidate the report, but it does
suggest that its results may not be a good representation of [REDACTED II] experiences and views.</blockquote></div><div>And what is REDACTED I and REDACTED II you ask? Well, that's the thing....</div><div><br /></div><div>REDACTED I is Dalits i.e. low caste Hindus and REDACTED II is Indian Americans. </div><div><br /></div><div>Call me cynical but I'm guessing if the Dalits were complaining about heritage Americans suddenly we'd be expected to swallow these atrocity stories whole. </div><div><br /></div><div>It's just like how everything is <i>raciss</i> except for grooming gangs which are just random collections of people with nothing in common whatsoever. </div><div><br /></div><div>In fact, it's worse than that. These kind of surveys are exactly the kind of thing the spoilt daughters of Brahmin caste immigrants cite as proof that the West sucks. Not only are they taken as proof positive of discrimination in those cases, we're <b>definitely</b> not allowed to ask if their upbringing as members of a supposed elite might have possibly, just maybe, given them absurd expectations of deference from all and sundry. </div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-58981799427024442452022-06-29T09:09:00.003+01:002022-06-29T09:11:56.237+01:00They're Called The Gaystapo For A Reason<div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><div>Annnnd just like that, another deranged right-wing conspiracy theory turns out to be..... <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10960283/Council-boss-admits-homophobia-concerns-affected-Star-Hobson-case.html">completely true.</a> </div><div><br />We were right and the left wasn't just wrong, they lied about it for nearly two years. </div><div><br /></div><div>You can't call it unprecedented. It's not even unprecedented in <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-480151/Gay-couple-left-free-abuse-boys--social-workers-feared-branded-homophobic.html">West Yorkshire. </a></div><div><br /></div><div>Still, you have to give the spineless weasels in local government this much: we're not talking about people who <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10957991/Laurence-Fox-allowed-Twitter-immediately-hits-critics-including-Kathy-Burke.html">take criticism well. </a></div><div><br /></div><div>Yes, indeed. Compare them to Nazis and they'll demand you are swept away as though by a purifying wind. </div><div><br /></div><div>Hey, you know what would make people think better of the Pink Mafia? If they were as outraged at people who let a child die as they are at someone mocking the Holy Month of Pink. </div><div><br /></div><div>Anyone think we should 'investigate' the Do Nothing Squad? Anyone at all? </div><div><br /></div><div>And so again we're back to one of my favourite themes: why is the British right so spineless? The left got massive mileage out of pushing the whole 'paedo priests' thing, now we have the anti-matter version of this with the same kind of cover ups and wilful blindness in the left's own priesthood, but the cucks think it's a losing issue. </div><div><br /></div><div><i>Huh?</i></div><div><br /></div><div>This is our alleged professional conservative genius set: people who are worried about losing votes by being too hard on organisations that cover up paedophilia. To state their position clearly is to refute it, but apparently we're the crazy ones. </div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-21936371681011460332022-06-15T20:17:00.004+01:002022-06-15T22:19:32.473+01:00King Unknown The First Outlaws Britain<div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><div><i>Bad news everyone!</i> Apparently, the Government can put you under house arrest, close down your business and deny you cancer treatment but they can't deport the Beast of Benghazi. </div><div><br /></div><div>It's against his <i>umantites</i>, innit?</div><div><br /></div><div>The Beast wants safe haven but Rwanda doesn't count... for reasons. </div><div><br /></div><div>And that's why conservatives are racists! I'm willing to bet not one in a thousand of these morons could explain what's actually wrong with Rwanda. Nope, we're just meant to accept that it's full of.... <i>those people</i>. </div><div><br /></div><div>They never quite say what they mean but, then again, why would they have to? It's not like they need to appeal to actual voters. The Labour Party - <i>aka</i> the former People's Party - only campaigns in one constituency these days: Judgesham-on-sea. </div><div><br /></div><div>Meanwhile, the Cuckservatives refuse to draw the obvious conclusion from a Labour Party afraid even to state clearly what it believes. Like I keep saying, the left doesn't rely on judges to get its agenda through because its policies are popular. </div><div><br /></div><div>Besides, as the saying goes, justice must not only be done, but must be done behind closed doors with <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10919271/Fury-Strasbourg-REFUSE-identify-nameless-judge-torpedoed-Rwanda-deportation-flight.html">zero transparency. </a></div><div><br /></div><div>At least I think that's how it goes. Still, at least it's a reminder that for all the 'Putin supports Brexit' talking points, it always seems to be the Eurocrats that are down with Mother Russia. </div><div><br /></div><div>The only real issue I have with talk of 'foreign judges' is that it presupposes there is such a thing as a 'British' judge. </div><div><br /></div><div>Nope, all the judges round here are clearly proud citizens of the Republic of Davos. Meanwhile, just like the Rwandans, we're barbarous, primitive natives needing to be civilised by our betters. </div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-84389070695481758292022-05-29T12:21:00.002+01:002022-05-31T11:12:28.537+01:00Wenches Witch Hunt Witch Hunter, Witch Hunter Whines<div><span style="font-family: inherit;">Shocking news everyone! Despite the ongoing purge of straight white guys, it turns out showbiz is not, in fact, a rainbow utopia after all. </span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">Bring out the nano violins, ready to play the<a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10863975/Is-Noel-Clarke-one-victim-cancel-culture-predator-just-got-deserved.html"> saddest song ever:</a></span></div><blockquote><p class="mol-para-with-font" style="background-color: white; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">Noel Clarke's twin Bafta statuettes sit on the bookshelves of his West London home. </span></p><div><span style="background-color: white; font-family: inherit; letter-spacing: -0.16px;">Once they represented the pinnacle of his achievement as an actor, writer, producer and director. Today the bronze faces stare blankly out over a career that lies in tatters.</span></div></blockquote><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">Quick quiz: can you name the movies he got those awards for? </span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">Can anyone? </span></div><div><span style="background-color: white; font-family: inherit; letter-spacing: -0.16px;"><blockquote>He'd traced his roots in an episode of Who Do You Think You Are? and written and starred in the acclaimed Hood Trilogy of youth culture films, directing two of them</blockquote></span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">Yep, he's another black guy who makes programs about being a black guy. That's his whole thing. </span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">It was working as well:<br /></span></div><div><span style="background-color: white; font-family: inherit; letter-spacing: -0.16px;"><blockquote>Today he is a pariah after a string of highly damaging allegations led to the British Academy of Film and Television Arts suspending his membership, and withdrawing his 2021 Bafta award for outstanding contribution to British cinema just nine days after he was handed the coveted gong.</blockquote></span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;"><b>Outstanding</b> contribution you guys! </span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">Yeah, I'd like to see the working out on that calculation. What are the odds that anyone in Bafta could explain just what was so 'outstanding' about it all? </span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">But the real problem with victimhood poker is that sometimes other players will call you out:</span></div><div><p class="mol-para-with-font" style="background-color: white; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px;"></p><blockquote><p class="mol-para-with-font" style="background-color: white; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">Clarke, 46, a married father-of-four, is accused of being a sexual predator and a bully. Allegations – made by more than 20 women and spanning a 15-year period – include claims of unwanted touching or groping, sexually inappropriate behaviour and comments on set, the covert filming of a naked audition and the sharing of explicit pictures without consent.</span></p><p class="mol-para-with-font" style="background-color: white; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">Clarke, who grew up in a tough and impoverished part of West London, vehemently denies the claims. He has not, he says, been granted the presumption of innocence, let alone a fair hearing.</span></p></blockquote></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">So is he guilty? Maybe, maybe not, but in so far as these are specific allegations from actual, named people, they're at least 10,000 x more credible than the racial atrocity stories this grifter has built his career on. </span></div><blockquote><div><span style="background-color: white; font-family: inherit; letter-spacing: -0.16px;">He acknowledges that not all of his past behaviour has been beyond reproach, particularly when events of almost two decades ago are judged by the standards of today.</span></div></blockquote><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">Two decades ago. So, you know, 2002.</span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">You remember the crazed, anything goes culture of the Blair years, right? </span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">We're not talking 'Life On Mars' territory here. </span></div><div><p class="mol-para-with-font" style="background-color: white; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px;"></p><blockquote><p class="mol-para-with-font" style="background-color: white; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">Norwegian film producer Synne Seltveit claims that Clarke slapped her buttocks during a night out in Glasgow in 2015 and then later sent her an explicit picture via Snapchat.</span></p><p class="mol-para-with-font" style="background-color: white; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">On her first allegation, Clarke responds with a clear denial: 'I never slapped her bottom and would never have done that.'</span></p><p class="mol-para-with-font" style="background-color: white; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">But his response to her second allegation is less definite.</span></p></blockquote><p class="mol-para-with-font" style="background-color: white; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px;"></p></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">And really who amongst us can be expected to keep track of who we've sent pictures of our genitals to? </span></div><div><span style="background-color: white; font-family: inherit; letter-spacing: -0.16px;"><blockquote>Asked if he regrets this and wishes he had been more circumspect, he says again: '100 per cent.' Similarly, he concedes that he may have sometimes been 'over-tactile' but says he has never groped or tried to kiss a woman who 'didn't want to be kissed'.</blockquote></span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">Given that this is a guy who can't write a birthday card without including a scene where a hot, white girl jumps into bed with his character, I going to go out on a limb and suggest his definition of 'want' may be a little broad.</span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br />And that's the sauce for the goose aspect of it all. The law defines an incident as 'racist' if anyone believes it is racist. Crazy? Maybe, but that what it says. Meanwhile, we're apparently not allowed to ask if the complainants had anything in common? Say, ethnicity? </span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">It's probably nothing. </span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">A vote of thanks too for the feminists. They've spent decades claiming sexual harassment is about power not sex, now suddenly we have a race-obsessed nut who keeps getting involved in bizarre incidents with women of a certain ethnicity and they've taken a vow of silence. </span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">Everything is sexist, except for naked auditions which are totally a normal thing. </span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br />Even now the race card is still working for him, it's just not working quite as well as before. Someone should have told him: <i>When you play the game of victimhood, you win or you die!</i></span></div><div><br /></div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-35573568162713784002022-05-18T17:40:00.002+01:002022-05-18T17:43:33.310+01:00Your Pay Hasn't Been 'Frozen' It's Just Held Up In Traffic By A Protest<div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">Sometimes there is justice in the world... the very people who were delighted to use the Former World's Deadliest Virus as an excuse to harass anyone with an actual, productive job are now shocked - <i>shocked</i> - to find that the after-effects are hitting them <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10824695/Boris-Johnson-says-crime-cut-crucial-Priti-Patel-allows-special-constables-carry-Tasers.html">in the pocket. </a></span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">Who knew that morally, legally and scientifically dubious lockdowns would impact on the public finances? </span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">Also shocking: it turns out that the entire human right lobby was not, in fact, wiped out by covid after all. They were just pining for the fjords while the Government used bogus figures from its own employees to bring in national house arrest and crush small businesses. </span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">But now they're back baby!</span></div><div><p class="mol-para-with-font" id="ext-gen349" style="background-color: white; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px;"></p><blockquote><p class="mol-para-with-font" id="ext-gen349" style="background-color: white; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">But Amnesty International UK's policing expert warned that arming volunteer officers is 'dangerous' and will inevitably lead to 'more instances of misuse, serious harm and death from Tasers'. </span></p><p class="mol-para-with-font" id="ext-gen350" style="background-color: white; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">Oliver Feeley-Sprague.....</span></p></blockquote><p><span style="font-family: inherit;"><i>Stop laughing you oiks! </i></span></p><blockquote><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span face="graphik, Arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.16px;">Oliver Feeley-Sprague, </span><span face="graphik, Arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.16px;">a member of the independent advisory group to the National Police Chiefs' Council lead on Tasers....</span></span></blockquote><p class="mol-para-with-font" id="ext-gen350" style="background-color: white; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.16px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px;"></p><p class="mol-para-with-font" id="ext-gen350" style="background-color: white; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="background-color: transparent;"><span face="graphik, Arial, sans-serif"><span style="font-family: inherit; letter-spacing: -0.16px;">Well, isn't that just great? The public had the opportunity to vote for a party that was totally in tune with Amnesty International's agenda in December 2019... and they gave the other guys an eighty-seat majority but apparently none of that matters. Amnesia Intentional (motto: just forget about how many of our baby seals have turned out to be spitting cobras) might be toxic at the ballot box but that's no reason why they can't drive public policy. </span></span></span></p><p class="mol-para-with-font" id="ext-gen350" style="background-color: white; margin: 0px 0px 16px; min-height: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="background-color: transparent;"><span face="graphik, Arial, sans-serif"><span style="font-family: inherit; letter-spacing: -0.16px;"><i>Mandate? They don't need no stinking mandate!</i></span></span></span></p></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">Back to my usual point: if the cuckservatives really were all about electability, well, here's a £1,000 note lying on the ground that none of them want to pick it up. Kicking these entitled snooty prats to the kerb would do more for the Tories electoral prospects than any number of fine-tuned facebook ads and cutesy slogans. But no, they won't do it. </span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: inherit;">Spoiler alert: the left doesn't rely on obscure committees operating closed doors because its agenda is popular, and the cucks don't oppose actual conservatism because it isn't. </span></div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-82668276820706949712022-05-09T21:34:00.004+01:002022-05-09T22:09:59.375+01:00It's Their Country, We're Just Living In ItAh show biz... sometimes it's stupid and toxic, other times it's just the opposite: toxic and stupid. <div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><div><br /></div><div>Still, as long as politics are downstream of culture we need to pay attention to it all. After all, you can't have kids growing up immersed in leftist garbage and then expect them to go straight to voting conservative once they turn eighteen. </div><div><br /></div><div>Then there's the other thing - how liberal behave in show biz reveals how they would behave everywhere else if they had that same level of domination. </div><div><br /></div><div>All of which is why we have to talk about the whole Doctor Woke fiasco. </div><div><br /></div><div>Reminder: if the BBC just wanted to have a black lead in Doctor Who they could have bought back Jo Martin. Her Doctor had some real gravitas, some actual depth - which is more than we ever had with Jodie Whitaker's portrayal of the Doctor as some kind of Galactic children's TV presenter. </div><div><br /></div><div>But no: instead they went with <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-10797007/Ncuti-Gatwa-sends-emotional-thank-fans-Doctor-casting.html">this guy</a>, no doubt based on his previous work in... [checks notes] Netflix's 'Sex Education'. </div><div><br /></div><div>In case you haven't seen that show, to name it is to know it for the desperate exercise in try-hard edginess that it is. What it isn't is anything close to the sci-fi/fantasy genre. </div><div><br /></div><div>True, he is - allegedly - an actor so maybe he has the necessary range but given that he's taken over an iconic character and all he can talk about is <i>muh representation </i>I'm not hopeful. </div><div><i><br /></i></div><div><i>Yeah, yeah, I can see you've given some deep thought to what you can bring to the role. </i></div><div><i><br /></i></div><div>In so far as he seems to think that casting a black actor in a sci-fi/fantasy series is some kind of ground-breaking moment in pop culture history he doesn't seem to know much of anything about the genre he's supposed to be working in anyway. </div><div><br /></div><div>Basically, he's Jodie Whitaker Mark II, with race husting in place of <i>girrrrl powah</i> nonsense. </div><div><br /></div><div>The bottom line is that this guy hasn't been cast because he can bring anything to the sci-fi/fantasy genre, he's been cast because he can't. The BBC has always been deeply embarrassed by the Doctor Who fanbase - they'd really much rather pander to the kind of groovy teachers and disco vicars who watch 'Sex Education' hence this latest attempt to turn 'Doctor Who' into 'Sex Education in Space'. </div><div><br /></div><div>Yeah, yeah: you can make your own jokes, but the thing is that a lot of the 'Doctor Who' audience <i>is</i> geeky, kind of loser-y and just a bit weird and that's the point. The show managed to score lucrative overseas sales and merchandising deals while still being a a show for the people left on the kerb by the rest of our culture. It's for all the kids for whom travelling to another planet is only as unlikely as getting an invite to a cool party. 'Doctor Who' gave them a sense of belonging and hopefulness even when nothing else could and now the BBC - our public service broadcaster remember - is taking it away from them just out of spite. </div><div><br /></div><div>To the point: at any one time there are approximately eighty-six shows catering to the same North London wannabe cool wine aunt demographic as 'Sex Education' but it turns out eighty-six shows at once just aren't enough. No, Gaia forbid that one show should cater to the nerds. Literally everything on TV must be made for people in Islington. This is not representation, it's the exact opposite, a load of arrogant Metropolitan elitists are outraged that there is one - <b>one </b>- show on TV that doesn't pander to them. </div><div><br />Everything must be about them at all times. </div><div><br /></div><div>This is who they are. They think they should get their way always even when they, say, lose a referendum. Doesn't matter! Leave voters are losers so their votes shouldn't count anyway. </div><div><br /></div><div>Ditto, it's why Sir Kneealot went big on Partygate even while out in the real world household budgets were being crunched. Paying bills is boring and provincial, bogus thespian outrage is where it's at!</div><div><br /></div><div>The British left has become what it once opposed, an incestuous and insular elite living lives of absurd privilege and sneering at the rest of the country. </div><div><br /></div><div>And their shows are rubbish too. </div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-38939765768264175732022-04-12T21:33:00.006+01:002022-04-12T21:38:57.622+01:00Electability: It Used To Be A ThingHey, I'm so old I can remember Fat Dave Cameron's Reign of Error when we were constantly told that the Tory Party had to throw any conservatism whatsoever overboard in pursuit of the votes of a supposed group of moderates who would totally vote Conservative except for the whole 'conservatism' thing. <div><br /></div><div>It was all about 'electability' <i>you guys!</i><br /><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><div><br /></div><div>How times have changed - and not just because the party of BoJo and Crazy Dom Cummings managed to get more than twice as many votes in one go as electoral super genius Fat Dave managed in two attempts combined. Don't be shocked, but with vague signs of actual conservatism in the Conservative Party, the cucks have suddenly decided that crude vote chasing in no substitute for principle after all. Nope, now they've finally found some hills that <i>are </i>worth dying on. </div><div><br /></div><div>Like the very vital human right of spoilt rich kids to harass <a href="https://order-order.com/2022/04/12/defra-director-goldsmith-backs-extinction-rebellion/">member of the public. </a></div><div><br /></div><div>Or protecting members of one of our most vulnerable communities: <a href="https://order-order.com/2022/04/12/crispin-blunt-told-not-fit-to-hold-public-office-by-councillor-in-constituency-conservative-association/">sex offenders. </a></div><div><br /></div><div>And yes, that is *that* <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10604249/Tory-police-commissioner-slams-ridiculous-bid-Crispin-Blunt-silence-womens-rights.html">Crispin Blunt.</a></div><div><br /></div><div>Truly, he is a vote-winning machine. Either that or 'electability' was only ever a bogus concept used to purge anyone with actual conservative views from the Grifters Party. </div></div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-58184096787329323702022-04-11T18:12:00.003+01:002022-04-11T19:36:51.425+01:00A Cuck Gets CappedLike I keep saying, you can get into bed with the left but they won't respect you in the morning. Latest example of this rule: former future Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. <div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><div><br /></div><div>Hey, it seems like only yesterday he climbed aboard the SS Strange New Respect by endorsing the left's screechy eye-scratchy attack on BoJo for mentioning the Jimmy Saville thing. Apparently it was outrageously outrageous to suggest that the head of the Crown Prosecution Service has any influence over prosecutions. </div><div><br /></div><div><i>And that's how Rishi Sunak got the enduring gratitude and affection of the left!</i></div><div><br /></div><div>Remember: this is the guy that the <i>Professional Conservative Brains Trust</i> was assuring us was a political genius. These cucks are still out there now, trying to stop anyone pointing out the absurdity of the left's position. What is the left's point after all? That billionaire globalists have utter contempt for the countries they pretend to be loyal to? </div><div><br /></div><div>Yes, I do believe some of us have already noticed that. Meanwhile, the left (and the cucks) have spent years calling anyone who mentioned it a Nazi. They might not like billionaires but if it was a choice between supporting them or being on the same side as actual patriots? </div><div><br /></div><div>Exactly. </div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-17657928003800560892022-03-28T21:23:00.001+01:002022-03-28T21:23:44.936+01:00Annnd It's Still Not About Slavery....For possibly the first time ever, I actually think the race hustlers have a point. Bearing in mind that everyone knew he'd have to address the issue of slavery when touring the Caribbean, surely Prince William could have come up with something less pathetic than this? <div><div><span style="background-color: white; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.16px;"><blockquote><span style="font-family: inherit;">This is complicated, the issues themselves aren't complicated. All the repercussions if diplomatic relations and dealing with other countries and other organisations are extremely complicated.</span></blockquote></span><div><i>Just kidding! </i></div><div><br /></div><div>That's actually leftist pin-up Gareth Southgate <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-10652399/England-boss-Gareth-Southgate-insists-boycotting-Qatar-World-Cup-NOT-option.html">talking about the slavery </a>that's happening RIGHT NOW in Qatar. </div></div></div><div><br /></div><div>No wonder they're talking about Southgate as a potential Labour MP - that response was truly Starmeresque. I can't wait to see what he thinks a woman is!</div><div><br /></div><div>Apparently, Prince William is required to all but self-immolate to make up for slavery two hundred years ago, but champagne socialist Southgate can get away with generic blather like this safe in the knowledge that no one in the access media will ask him any difficult questions about his absurd position. </div><div><br /></div><div>Ditto - with swords, oak leaves and gold cluster - race hustlers like Raheem Sterling, Tyrone Mings and their pals. The MSM have spent years ignoring their sponsorship deals with extremely dodgy leisurewear companies and they're not going to start asking awkward questions now. </div><div><br /></div><div>On the plus side the good thing about having your clothes made in Chinese labour camps is that you don't have to worry that you'll get a badly produced shirt just because the slaves were slacking off on a Friday afternoon. </div><div><br /></div><div>Meanwhile, back in the real world, if the England team held a minute's silence for every slave killed building the World Cup stadiums, they'd be there for four and a half days. On the other hand, there's no evidence that any of the dead ever held a gun to pregnant woman's belly like St George of Floyd, so why should we bother commemorating such losers anyway? </div><div><br /></div><div>Besides, you know, <i>it's complicated!</i></div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6182119.post-56927338388491653232022-03-16T12:19:00.001+00:002022-03-16T12:21:28.953+00:00I Don't Think It's The 'Slavery' That's The Issue....Nothing to see here, just the Church of England putting up a monument to a slaver...and you probably will guess why. <div><blockquote>What the Cathedral describes as 'a bold new artwork' is a
twelve-foot-tall bright red effigy of the ruler of the African kingdom
of Benin, Oba Ovonramwen, who was deposed by a British expedition in
1897. There is no doubt about the celebratory intention of this work:
its artist, Victor Ehikhamenor, describes it as 'reawakening Oba
Ovonramwen and every other person that was violated during that
oppressive attack on the Benin Kingdom.'</blockquote></div><div>Yep, sometimes it's so blatant even The Cucktator has <a href="https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/why-is-st-paul-s-commemorating-a-benin-slave-trader-">to acknowledge it.</a></div><div><br /></div><div>Wait until someone tells this Victor guy about the oppressive attack on the Confederacy. </div><div><br /></div><div>For now though, I note a complete lack of effigies of Jefferson Davies in Anglican Cathedrals. </div>DJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00446322024174274621noreply@blogger.com0