Glad to see 'Biased BBC' reminding everyone of the BBC's role in acting as a publicly-funded PR agency for a bent copper. Still, I do like to ram the point home, so let me say it explicitly. The BBC - ever anxious about the rise of 'extremism' - granted a violent criminal the chance to push inflammatory, racist rhetoric without even the inconvenience of dealing with an interviewer.
But what was worse was that this lunatic's rantings were presented as objective commentary on the state of modern Britain, and the police in particular. Anyone right of Tony Blair is introduced as a 'right-winger', but a sleazy, race-hustling crook needs no warning label.
But what was worse was that this lunatic's rantings were presented as objective commentary on the state of modern Britain, and the police in particular. Anyone right of Tony Blair is introduced as a 'right-winger', but a sleazy, race-hustling crook needs no warning label.
5 comments:
You say Dizaei was a "race hustling crook", but I prefer the words of former Dizaei booster Herman Ouseley who writes that he had "professional shortcomings".
If I had a blog I would have titled this post:
Dizaei Rascal
Feel free to run with that one Jon!
Lurker
Just did a search on the phrase "Dizaei Rascal" only to find its been used several times already. Bastards.
And there was me all pleased with myself. Ah well...
Thousands of letters in their alphabet, and the Chinese don't have one for "sex"?
Yet another example of how they need to copy the western devils!
Lurker
Post a Comment