Don't be shocked, but The Dave throwing the Army under the bus last week didn't actually result in anyone except him and his cronies actually 'drawing a line' under anything much.
Here we go again!
The thing is that the vile little toad - Adams, not Cameron - has a point. If you take the absurd precedent set by Saville seriously, then why not? In fact, Adams's position is arguably less absurd than Saville's, being based on the latter's pseudo-legal precedent rather than carved out of whole cloth as Saville's train wreck legal reasoning was.
Here we go again!
The thing is that the vile little toad - Adams, not Cameron - has a point. If you take the absurd precedent set by Saville seriously, then why not? In fact, Adams's position is arguably less absurd than Saville's, being based on the latter's pseudo-legal precedent rather than carved out of whole cloth as Saville's train wreck legal reasoning was.
1 comment:
I honestly don't think [if that's what you have implied and correct me if I'm wrong], that Cameron expected to gain anything or to prevent anything by wallowing in this show trial's absurd findings.
I don't think he was trying to protect the Army - past or present -, or trying to salvage any goodwill that might exist about the 'peace process.'
I think he bit the judge's hand off and bigged up the findings because that's what liberals DO - they agree when safe [and protected] privileged civilians second-guess the men who put their lives on the line to protect their cosy world of freedom and prosperity - be it forty years ago or last week.
Post a Comment