How low can the L3 go ? Well, this low actually:
Those of us who hate multiculturalism are often denounced as racists by the L3, but look what's happening here. The 'racist right' want child abuse treated as a serious crime under all circumstances, but the L3 (and never has the phrase Loony Left Liberal been so apt) claim that it's serious if it's a native child, but if it the progeny of some fourth worlders, well, hey, it's just a wacky faux pas, so slap on the wrist, and no hard feelings. Consider this, if you were a hardcore white racist, just how would your position differ from that of the Left ?
That's the X-factor behind the BNP's recent rise to prominence. If you're going to call people Nazis for being sickened at the sight of the courts doing all but giving group hugs to child abusers, then don't be surprised if they turn to folks like the BNP.
Of course, these cases do seem to happen rather more frequently amongst certain people. Even our Liberal friends have to admit that:
A BANGLADESHI woman who shook a baby boy so violently that he suffered brain damage walked free from court yesterday because a judge conceded that she did not know how to behave in the West.....Yes, she was unfamiliar with our wacky Western customs such as NOT TORTURING OUR KIDS. After all, who's to say that torturing your child is necessarily any worse than not doing so ? Well, actually, just about every worthwhile civilisation that's ever existed. Being sympathetic to child abusers isn't moral relativism, it's moral nihlism. All this Liberal talk of 'tolerance' is just a euphamism for the surrender of every moral precept western civilisation has ever believed in.
The injuries inflicted on the child over several weeks had caused one side of his brain to shrink. It was believed that the boy would have been screaming in agony for eight weeks because his injuries went untreated.
Those of us who hate multiculturalism are often denounced as racists by the L3, but look what's happening here. The 'racist right' want child abuse treated as a serious crime under all circumstances, but the L3 (and never has the phrase Loony Left Liberal been so apt) claim that it's serious if it's a native child, but if it the progeny of some fourth worlders, well, hey, it's just a wacky faux pas, so slap on the wrist, and no hard feelings. Consider this, if you were a hardcore white racist, just how would your position differ from that of the Left ?
That's the X-factor behind the BNP's recent rise to prominence. If you're going to call people Nazis for being sickened at the sight of the courts doing all but giving group hugs to child abusers, then don't be surprised if they turn to folks like the BNP.
Of course, these cases do seem to happen rather more frequently amongst certain people. Even our Liberal friends have to admit that:
The court was told that Khanom, a Muslim, did not understand that shaking a helpless baby would not exorcise an evil spirit.Well, m'kay. Clearly another of those 'highly skilled immigrants' our economy needs. Still, I guess we do have to take into account the fact some people really believe that their baby is possessed by an evil spirit, but can the L3 at least stop yammering about 'Islamophobia' ? If the courts are allowed to take into account the fact Islam drives people to behave like savages even to their own kids, then I don't think it's unreasonable for the rest of us to take note as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment